From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29323 invoked by alias); 14 May 2002 13:54:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29278 invoked from network); 14 May 2002 13:54:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 May 2002 13:54:36 -0000 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (romulus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.251]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA11292; Tue, 14 May 2002 06:54:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 8A2C710FC9; Tue, 14 May 2002 09:53:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15585.5879.415058.428994@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 06:54:00 -0000 To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove sh-hms target In-Reply-To: References: <15584.19286.75849.849229@localhost.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00537.txt.bz2 Alexandre Oliva writes: > On May 13, 2002, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > > The sh-hms target wasn't really doing anything different from sh-elf > > for what gdb was concerned. It built exactly the same set of files. > > Hmm... AFAIK, sh-hms is a variant of sh-coff, not sh-elf. Shouldn't > it be retained at least as an alias? > I think I didn't express myself clearly. You can still build a toolchain with --target=sh-hms, it's just that the gdb executable will be exactly the same as if you said --target=sh-elf. The reason for 'removing' sh-hms is more for testing purposes than anything else. Elena