Re: [RFA] Type cleanups

[Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>]

Andrew Cagney writes:
 > 
 > >> Did you check all the cross targets build per MAINTAINERS?  From memory 
 > >> sh-hms[bfd] and avr[need to look] don't build at present (well as of 
 > >> ~2002-05-12-gmt).
 > >> 
 > >> If that has been checked, then yes ``obviously''.
 > > 
 > > 
 > > A few don't build; none of them are my fault.  For the record:
 > > 
 > > 	At least fr30-elf, mn10300-elf, and v850-elf have missing
 > > dependencies off in sim/ land; they built with non-parallel make only.
 > 
 > > 	hppa1.1-hp-proelf wants dl.h and machine/save_state.h in
 > > hppa-tdep.c, and was already marked broken.  The nice gawk segment
 > > doesn't notice that...
 > 
 > HP/UX isn't on the list.  I get:
 > 
 > hppa1.1-hp-proelf broken
 > 
 > The note should probably mention that you normally want to stip out 
 > broken targets.
 > 
 > > 	Several targets (i586-pc-msdosdjgpp, sparc-elf, sparc64-elf)
 > > 	failed with this message (also JB_SP for Sparc):
 > > 
 > > In file included from /usr/include/setjmp.h:30,
 > >                  from ../../src-build/gdb/top.c:58:
 > > /usr/include/bits/setjmp.h:31: warning: `JB_PC' redefined
 > > tm.h:57: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
 > > make[1]: *** [top.o] Error 1
 > 
 > I don't get that on the three systems I use.  Bug in the system library?
 > 
 > > 
 > > 	sh-hms failed with a reference to some new SHmedia code.
 > 
 > Yes, per above, BFD problem.  sh-hms doesn't enable full SH support in BFD.
 > 

Yes.
I am looking into this right now.
Elena


 > Andrew
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >