From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10214 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2002 00:48:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10207 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2002 00:48:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 25 Apr 2002 00:48:46 -0000 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (romulus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.251]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA19849; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 0D16111414; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:48:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15559.21063.795167.38509@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:48:00 -0000 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: davem@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Peter.Schauer@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de Subject: Re: [RFA] Kill SOFUN_ADDRESS_MAYBE_MISSING In-Reply-To: <200204241534.g3OFYch06508@duracef.shout.net> References: <200204241534.g3OFYch06508@duracef.shout.net> X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00991.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: > For what it's worth, my native i686-pc-linux-gnu test bed has no > regressions with this patch (five gcc's with -gdwarf-2 and -gstabs+). > > Michael C The macro was defined for this target. So I would expect no differences. Well, hopefully. We need to test on a platform that doesn't define it. HP-UX? Aix? Elena