From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4980 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2002 04:40:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4847 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2002 04:40:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2002 04:40:41 -0000 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (cse.cygnus.com [205.180.230.236]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA27301; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 20:40:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 469) id 9215D112E4; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 23:40:09 -0500 (EST) From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15512.4777.468034.323283@localhost.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 20:40:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Alexandre Oliva , Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB CVS won't build on OSF4.0's cc In-Reply-To: <3C97F673.7080306@cygnus.com> References: <15134.37007.772051.431723@kwikemart.cygnus.com> <15140.51449.939073.693253@kwikemart.cygnus.com> <15511.30770.115770.867801@localhost.redhat.com> <15511.34746.193064.112834@localhost.redhat.com> <3C97F673.7080306@cygnus.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under Emacs 20.7.1 X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00374.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > > > > Great. > > > > > >> Is there a bug report for this? > > > > > > Other than the one that came with the patch posted to this mailing > > list? I don't think so? Should I create one, install the patch and > > then close it? > > I counted 4 or 5! You should look at gdb/390, there may still be > ``issues''. There is also 294 (which is essentially a duplicate of 390). Alex, can you take a look? Maybe your configury test needs to be made a bit more sophisticated. http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?database=gdb Elena > > > I'm not aware of such GDB policies :-( > > I think people doing this are viewed in a positive light (however there > isn't any strict requirement :-). > > The rewritten web page reads: > > > GDB has a Bug Database. It is used to track bugs (Problem Reports or PRs) and enhancements (Change Requests or CRs). In addition to problems encountered when running GDB, bugs include: errors or missing documentation; missing test cases; web changes; work in progress; dummy reports for fixed but unreported bugs; entries of not-a-bugs; and even adminstrivia. > > Andrew >