From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14610 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2019 20:34:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14601 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jan 2019 20:34:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mailsec118.isp.belgacom.be Received: from mailsec118.isp.belgacom.be (HELO mailsec118.isp.belgacom.be) (195.238.20.114) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 20:34:23 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=skynet.be; i=@skynet.be; q=dns/txt; s=securemail; t=1548794063; x=1580330063; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JgqrfiUO92rvLf7eCxE1TcbUxN1m+P/d66f6AhPNg4k=; b=I0Bu/cDr7kH6r4WeFY3R3VVIaKbwu3Ud/gtPz9QnMXHTbcQWofqOa5uH v+qizHaA8FcJG7YlwYTXI198rxLmyQ==; Received: from 30.202-67-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO md) ([87.67.202.30]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jan 2019 21:34:20 +0100 Message-ID: <1548794060.1493.16.camel@skynet.be> Subject: Re: [RFAv2 1/3] Use function_name_style to print Ada and C function names From: Philippe Waroquiers To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 20:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1548500642.1493.8.camel@skynet.be> References: <20190112222835.16932-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> <20190112222835.16932-2-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> <877ef2ncvy.fsf@tromey.com> <1547899873.15869.5.camel@skynet.be> <20190126062147.GA26587@adacore.com> <1548500642.1493.8.camel@skynet.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg00611.txt.bz2 On Sat, 2019-01-26 at 12:04 +0100, Philippe Waroquiers wrote: > > With all that, I'm wondering if Philippe had other examples > > where he can demonstrate the usefulness of this patch. > > At the moment, if the maintenance command is the only case, > > knowing that the output gets sent to a file, rather than > > stdout, and thus should not be stylized, are there other > > situations I couldn't think of where this patch would be > > useful? > > This part of the patch ensures that the function names in the output of > 'info functions [-q] [-t TYPEREGEXP] [NAMEREGEXP]' > are stylized. Any additional comments ? Ok to push ? Thanks Philippe