From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18239 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2019 17:32:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18219 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jan 2019 17:32:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=consideration, wish X-HELO: mailsec110.isp.belgacom.be Received: from mailsec110.isp.belgacom.be (HELO mailsec110.isp.belgacom.be) (195.238.20.106) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:32:23 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=skynet.be; i=@skynet.be; q=dns/txt; s=securemail; t=1547919143; x=1579455143; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yZBB6JOJAZMUaroq1Gg6ezm+ry3cyCfYhWRTKHSaVwI=; b=FNEpkPtGi0lqRWSNgXJqHRSbRMzSIHj85PO5a/Ijtdbr3OXknhOLkdDn IHq0D7meLjFEiBGedlJcP1uHkGTVMA==; Received: from 184.205-67-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO md) ([87.67.205.184]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2019 18:32:20 +0100 Message-ID: <1547919140.15869.9.camel@skynet.be> Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix leaks in macro definitions. From: Philippe Waroquiers To: Tom Tromey Cc: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87va2mly6t.fsf@tromey.com> References: <20190115055611.17967-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> <63b6768fbedbe46b7a46f0d29f7b178c@polymtl.ca> <87h8e9on9h.fsf@tromey.com> <1547581545.1726.3.camel@skynet.be> <87imypturq.fsf@tromey.com> <87va2mly6t.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg00438.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2019-01-17 at 15:24 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > > > > > > "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: > > > > > > "Philippe" == Philippe Waroquiers writes: > > Philippe> Deciding for a fix in splay tree for sure implies > Philippe> more discussions (no idea who knows where libiberty is used). > > Tom> This isn't typically a consideration for libiberty. It's not released > Tom> separately from the gcc and binutils-gdb trees, so if someone else out > Tom> there is using it, they need to keep watch over what they do when they > Tom> start using a new version. > > BTW, I can send a patch to gcc if you would prefer. Yes, if the below patch is ok, it would be really nice if you could send it to gcc: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-01/msg00437.html (of course, fix/update the patch as you wish/as needed). Thanks Philippe