From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21271 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2014 18:42:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21262 invoked by uid 89); 6 Feb 2014 18:42:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.gentoo.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:42:53 +0000 Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C9033F982; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 18:42:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: gdbreplay not installed Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1547911.jZ2b8VuqBM@vapier> User-Agent: KMail/4.12.1 (Linux/3.13.0; KDE/4.12.1; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <52F3CEB0.4000502@redhat.com> References: <83d2j0z9pf.fsf@gnu.org> <22448237.zgeW1rGICq@vapier> <52F3CEB0.4000502@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3033617.3s6zh49GiX"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00117.txt.bz2 --nextPart3033617.3s6zh49GiX Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-length: 1118 On Thursday, February 06, 2014 18:04:32 Pedro Alves wrote: > On 02/06/2014 01:34 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thursday, February 06, 2014 14:50:36 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> I noticed that gdbreplay is built, but not installed by "make > >> install". Is that on purpose? > >=20 > > previous discussion: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-12/msg00915.html > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-01/msg00002.html > >=20 > > oh gawd, has it really been 2 years already ... >=20 > I won't object to installing it if turns out multiple people > do want it installed, but I have to say I have trouble > figuring out _who_ but maintainers (and integrators doing > their own maintenance) would want it. sorry, i meant "i can't believe i vividly recalled a conversation that=20 happened 2 years ago" not "wtf haven't you merged a patch that's 2 years ol= d". i think your qualification is accurate as to the target audience. i wanted= it=20 at the time for my own debug work and instinctively reached to have it=20 installed. i don't think there's a wider group of people clamouring for it. -mike= --nextPart3033617.3s6zh49GiX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-length: 836 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJS89euAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBSy0P/1l+eT8ZYch2631IABZhILTp AzvfmzNexRMKY/RKuBW1X7w6W2X2BtHyN0ldBkwZuRrM3Ac5nMTpxlDir1xAmkD6 tsPEBMzwkLaZGlzXMgWD/KVLmD4y7HPxud8adLxxax26XANkLFZ2ssaJ/CS/1voX 1Y3EsRh0Y6FUrTmXMOEkni1rnqN4cUjaeexNhXBVIbKaica8y9/HakVfovtQDjyd uzzi8bYL6U9XRcZvOCiLMpaEzO2b+bNsrqBxms24vGOoX4Pp56FOk5CdC3Am3C95 9DTZHynB0jMO0HbxGliOSW2KM1X0spVGKvsQDE4VabTFf+oJd6p5WI7WchT1fVKh tNl+0tDUADX5CTEmX4ZIqVWAYm8BGaVny5QF6rF5M2+NoGWuD8gS3IE4jhhOdYWa IxDqF+ca+4qMeUnARKFfClN9IvfjDJLQEdzOZ9rLdB6vqAqwrT5YmTrHLtFfm1K6 WGFT2uyWlbfaS4vJlZsdCl7cK60TiGI9fE5+8hd0s/XUVQBwfaPiiIQaHfj/bqxL FQ7Akr6SVYU9i/efDQHNL5PdBDR5wn8Pc31jYr9qxYQu4Swzi0UNWYVn0+Yoru3m zC7YpVyygvKXHSJjmRAUKWhlQ6DQ4aSrfZ+u7aVEYxn9ya86Ep/5QTgxaAHM1RCp VSogtJr5R2ezd71aCHu7 =0pHf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3033617.3s6zh49GiX--