From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13216 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2002 04:28:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13106 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2002 04:28:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hypatia.brisbane.redhat.com) (202.83.74.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2002 04:28:04 -0000 Received: from scooby.brisbane.redhat.com (scooby.brisbane.redhat.com [172.16.5.228]) by hypatia.brisbane.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g154RsY22483; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 14:27:55 +1000 Received: by scooby.brisbane.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1B00C108A0; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 15:27:54 +1100 (EST) From: Ben Elliston MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15455.24394.87381.934711@scooby.brisbane.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 20:28:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: SH5 simulator contribution In-Reply-To: <3C5F55F3.2030807@cygnus.com> References: <15451.47633.743434.331956@scooby.brisbane.redhat.com> <3C5F55F3.2030807@cygnus.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid X-Legal: http://apac.redhat.com/disclaimer X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney writes: Andrew> Firstly, GDB already has an SH simululator that can be used to generate Andrew> a sh1, sh2, sh3, sh3e, sh4 and sh-dsp (but only one at a time). Does Andrew> this new simulator cover that set or only a subset? i.e. is it a drop Andrew> in replacement? It covers a subset. It will handle sh2, sh3, sh4 and sh5. In other words, it is not (quite) yet able to replace the existing SH[1-4] simulator. Andrew> Secondly, the MIPS, mn10300, d10v and other IGEN simulators support more Andrew> than one cpu variant (can't use ISA - see binutils list :-/). How does Andrew> this simulator go in this regard? I'm afraid I'm going to need you to clarify the terminology. :-( Ben