From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21972 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2018 21:14:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21950 invoked by uid 89); 20 Dec 2018 21:14:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mailsec118.isp.belgacom.be Received: from mailsec118.isp.belgacom.be (HELO mailsec118.isp.belgacom.be) (195.238.20.114) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 21:14:09 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=skynet.be; i=@skynet.be; q=dns/txt; s=securemail; t=1545340449; x=1576876449; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KSCD5mD2nfFJrAZ9sOuGJgoziaYDW6ZZLWEi7K3xxfs=; b=RulsEqpzTLRZfidbOvxRsFH5eZCzXOfQ8ffqMCTuDyaSbcWtIRSCbkYb 8KUz1ticqZsn6HXpHJI8qg9BesjGmA==; Received: from 184.205-67-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO md) ([87.67.205.184]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Dec 2018 22:14:06 +0100 Message-ID: <1545340446.2974.11.camel@skynet.be> Subject: Re: [RFA] Ensure deterministic result order in gdb.ada/info_auto_lang.exp From: Philippe Waroquiers To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 21:14:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20181220075728.GC12440@adacore.com> References: <20181201133810.9542-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> <1545255361.2974.2.camel@skynet.be> <20181220052958.GB12440@adacore.com> <1545286359.2974.9.camel@skynet.be> <20181220075728.GC12440@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-12/txt/msg00239.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 11:57 +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I would personally start with your patch, and adjust later, if it turns > out we have enough testcases facing that issue. > > And for the avoidance of doubt, and not hold the patch waiting for me, > your patch looks good to me. Thanks, patch pushed (with only normalizing in this test, as discussed above). Philippe