From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 47624 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2018 06:12:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 46423 invoked by uid 89); 20 Dec 2018 06:12:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*MI:sk:2018122, everyday, Hx-languages-length:865, his X-HELO: mailsec110.isp.belgacom.be Received: from mailsec110.isp.belgacom.be (HELO mailsec110.isp.belgacom.be) (195.238.20.106) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 06:12:41 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=skynet.be; i=@skynet.be; q=dns/txt; s=securemail; t=1545286362; x=1576822362; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NBtfpK4EHpeOAvHPuGe/Ig18IfPvfF2pmFxhNGEj6Mo=; b=L/ZUCnvTyCkx1n2KlJvl86RrO+YF3HxWfP0+0LFyG/TtejDejbuEBUkH uWtvw/bCKXtkWFha92HtWeqpW/Pmig==; Received: from 184.205-67-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO md) ([87.67.205.184]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Dec 2018 07:12:39 +0100 Message-ID: <1545286359.2974.9.camel@skynet.be> Subject: Re: [RFA] Ensure deterministic result order in gdb.ada/info_auto_lang.exp From: Philippe Waroquiers To: Simon Marchi , Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 06:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: <20181201133810.9542-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> <1545255361.2974.2.camel@skynet.be> <20181220052958.GB12440@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-12/txt/msg00231.txt.bz2 Simon/Joel, thanks for the help, I see everyday that I am far to master the gdb subtleties :). On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 00:50 -0500, Simon Marchi wrote: > On 2018-12-20 00:29, Joel Brobecker wrote: ... > > However, if you configure using a relative path to the configure > > script, > > things become different. Effectively, I am building and testing out-of-tree, but with a relative configure => I will change to use an absolute configure path. > Then, I think it makes sense to normalize the paths in order to have a > predictable output, regardless of how gdb was configured, as Philippe > suggested. Are you also ok with his patch? And if ok, do we better do standard_csrcfile_for_ada used for all such c files used by gdb.ada, or do we limit the normalization to this test ? Philippe