From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11616 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2001 23:31:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11595 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2001 23:31:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Dec 2001 23:31:45 -0000 Received: from rtl.cygnus.com (cse.cygnus.com [205.180.230.236]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA05777; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 15:31:38 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ezannoni@localhost) by rtl.cygnus.com (8.11.2/8.11.0) id fBKMiVo03019; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 17:44:31 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ezannoni set sender to ezannoni@cygnus.com using -f From: Elena Zannoni MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15394.27087.764468.561677@localhost.localdomain> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 15:31:00 -0000 To: Kevin Buettner Cc: Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Define FETCH_INFERIOR_REGISTERS for ppc linux. In-Reply-To: <1011220210243.ZM29228@ocotillo.lan> References: <15394.9214.178652.70165@localhost.localdomain> <1011220210243.ZM29228@ocotillo.lan> X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under Emacs 20.7.1 X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00548.txt.bz2 Kevin Buettner writes: > On Dec 20, 12:46pm, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > > This patch is a subset of the changes initially submitted in: > > > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-11/msg00548.html > > > > Nothing in this patch has to do with AltiVec registers. I included > > only the part that moves the fetch/store inferior registers machinery > > from infptrace.c to ppc-linux-nat.c. With that, it became possible to > > clean up some macros from config/powerpc/nm-linux.h and get rid of the > > use of core-aout.c. > > > > Given the discussions we had in the original thread, these changes > > become quite straightforward. > > > > Tested on ppc-linux native and aix4.3 (for paranoia's sake). > > > > OK? > > Yes, approved. > > One question though. Is KERNEL_U_SIZE still needed? > It is used by the 'maint udot' command, which is available if CHILD_XFER_MEMORY is not defined, which seems to be the case for ppc-linux (it is defined for aix). > Thanks, > > Kevin I commited the patch. Elena