From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-11102-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 24665 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2001 15:01:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 24633 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2001 15:01:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2001 15:01:40 -0000
Received: from rtl.cygnus.com (cse.cygnus.com [205.180.230.236])
	by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA01953;
	Thu, 6 Dec 2001 07:01:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from ezannoni@localhost)
	by rtl.cygnus.com (8.11.2/8.11.0) id fB6F7gk01287;
	Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:07:42 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: krustylu.cygnus.com: ezannoni set sender to ezannoni@cygnus.com using -f
From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15375.35262.350039.535149@krustylu.cygnus.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 07:01:00 -0000
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
        Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>,
        gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Allow casting of object pointers for method calls
In-Reply-To: <3C0BE9A9.5040106@cygnus.com>
References: <200112031805.MAA10239@duracef.shout.net>
	<20011203131234.A20076@nevyn.them.org>
	<3C0BE9A9.5040106@cygnus.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.97 under Emacs 20.7.1
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00169.txt.bz2

Andrew Cagney writes:
 > > 
 > > I'm pretty sure that a patch for this was approved on mainline
 > > in November:
 > >   http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-11/msg00231.html
 > > 
 > > You're not going to be able to use 5.1-branch with the output of GCC mainline
 > > unless this is moved to the branch.
 > > 
 > > The branch is open again, right, Andrew?  If so, this would be a good
 > > candidate.
 > 
 > (Yes the branch is open). Good question.  Elena?
 > 
 > 	Andrew
 > 
 > 

Yes, I think it should go in, or gdb is completely useless.

I'll just commit it. It shouldn't break anything if we use an older
gcc, I hope.

Elena