From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com>, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa] symbol hashing, part 1/n - updates to hash functions
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:54:00 -0000
Message-id: <15303.5067.139158.779831@krustylu.cygnus.com>
References: <15302.12828.829882.614493@krustylu.cygnus.com> <B987FF9E-BEA3-11D5-A4DE-0030657B5340@cgsoftware.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00167.html

Daniel Berlin writes:
 > 
 > On Thursday, October 11, 2001, at 07:58  PM, Elena Zannoni wrote:
 > 
 > > Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
 > >> This patch still has two logical parts; if you strongly prefer I can 
 > >> break
 > >> it up further, but they are somewhat intertwined and I think neither 
 > >> should
 > >> be objectionable.  They are:
 > >>   - Fix a looping bug in msymbol_hash_iw.  It would not stop on '(' if 
 > >> there
 > >> was whitespace before it.
 > >>   - Update to use the identifier hash function that libiberty uses, and
 > >> more buckets.
 > >>
 > >> Is this OK?
 > >
 > > Looks ok to me in theory. Except that, why was the
 > >
 > >  '% MINIMAL_SYMBOL_HASH_SIZE;'
 > >
 > > bit moved outside of the msymbol_hash and msymbol_hash_iw functions?
 > So msymbol_hash and hash_iw could be used elsewhere.

I see, can we leave the "% MINIMAL_SYMBOL_HASH_SIZE;" where it was
then, until we get to the next patch?

 > 
 > > You still do the same operation with the results returned by the two
 > > functions anyway.
 > >
 > Except, now they are just hash functions, not hash functions that only 
 > work for the minsym hash tables.
 > 

Right, OK.

 > > Also, where are these 2 functions used besides mynsyms.c?
 > In a further symbol hashing patch, unless he changed it.
 > 

All right. Then the changes to the '%' thing should be put in the
future patch.

 > > I think we
 > > should make them static and remove the extern from symtab.h.
 > >
 > 
 > > Can you give me an example where the '(' error comes up? (Just so I
 > > understand it better).  How did you come up with the number of
 > > buckets?
 > 
 > Averaging based on a large number of gnome, kde, and other real 
 > applications (ie emacs), compiled with debug info.
 > 349 is way too small, we ended up with chains > length 100, all the time.
 > 

OK.

 > >  Is this also used in libiberty?
 > 
 > Which, the hash function?
 > > Can you fix it and resubmit?
 > >

Never mind, I  meant the number of buckets. But you answered that.

Elena