Re: [rfa] symbol hashing, part 2/n - ALL_BLOCK_SYMBOLS

[Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com>]

Daniel Berlin writes:
 > 
 > On Thursday, October 11, 2001, at 07:46  PM, Elena Zannoni wrote:
 > 
 > >
 > > Daniel,
 > > Thanks so much for doing this. It makes it so much easier.
 > >
 > > Yes, I looked ths over and it seems to work, except that I would really
 > > prefer the change to printcmd.c split in two. The first bit to
 > > rationalize that "if (func)..."  code. This would have with it all
 > > the indentation changes as well. The code as it is now doesn't really
 > > make much sense. So, that looks a good change to me. But it has nothing
 > > to do with the new macro.  After that change is in, you can introduce
 > > the macro in printcmd.c w/o having all the indent changes.
 > > It also makes it easier to distinguish a no-op change (the macro) from
 > > the other one.
 > >
 > > The cahnge is printcmd.c needs to delete also the
 > > 	  sym = BLOCK_SYM (b, i);
 > > line.
 > >
 > > [Note that I don't maintain printcmd.c, so, I should just shut up :-)]
 > >
 > > I applied your patch as is to my sources, and did a grep for BLOCK_SYM,
 > > and found a few more for loops that could be converted:
 > >
 > >
 > > This one in buildsym.c:
 > > line ~280:
 > >
 > > 	  struct symbol *sym;
 > > 	  for (i = 0; i < BLOCK_NSYMS (block); i++)
 > > 	    {
 > > 	      sym = BLOCK_SYM (block, i);
 > >
 > > And this one in symtab.c:
 > > line ~1500:
 > >
 > > 	top = BLOCK_NSYMS (block);
 > > 	for (bot = 0; bot < top; bot++)
 > > 	  {
 > > 	    sym = BLOCK_SYM (block, bot);
 > >
 > 
 > Both of these loops get changed by the next patch i'm sure he'll submit, 
 > to introduce hashed blocks, which is probably why he didn't change them.

Ok, thanks!

Elena