From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 108146 invoked by alias); 18 May 2018 21:29:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 108115 invoked by uid 89); 18 May 2018 21:29:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:841 X-HELO: mailsec115.isp.belgacom.be Received: from mailsec115.isp.belgacom.be (HELO mailsec115.isp.belgacom.be) (195.238.20.111) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 May 2018 21:29:33 +0000 IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3ACVYa3RYEAO0GAF8DA0Xz+Pb/LSx+4OfEezUN459i?= =?us-ascii?q?sYplN5qZr8m7bnLW6fgltlLVR4KTs6sC17KN9fi4EUU7or+5+EgYd5JNUxJXwe?= =?us-ascii?q?43pCcHRPC/NEvgMfTxZDY7FskRHHVs/nW8LFQHUJ2mPw6arXK99yMdFQviPgRp?= =?us-ascii?q?OOv1BpTSj8Oq3Oyu5pHfeQpFiCazbL9oMBm6sRjau9ULj4dlNqs/0AbCrGFSe+?= =?us-ascii?q?RRy2NoJFaTkAj568yt4pNt8Dletuw4+cJYXqr0Y6o3TbpDDDQ7KG81/9HktQPC?= =?us-ascii?q?TQSU+HQRVHgdnwdSDAjE6BH6WYrxsjf/u+Fg1iSWIdH6QLYpUjmk8qxlSgLniD?= =?us-ascii?q?0fOjA67W/ZitJ+gqxZrxKvuxNxxIHbbo6OOfpifK7QZ88WSHBdUstTUSFKH4Oy?= =?us-ascii?q?b5EID+oEJetWtYn9p1oKrRu/HQmsHP3gwSJIiXDsx6061P0hERzH3AM+BdIOq2?= =?us-ascii?q?nfodLtNKcSUOC1yKjIzS3bb/xIwzv85pLHcgomofGVQLJwcNTeyVM0Fw7elVWQ?= =?us-ascii?q?qozkPzWL2eQRqWSU9PRvWPuphmU6qA9xuiCiytowhoTNnI4Z117J+TljzIooO9?= =?us-ascii?q?G1SVR3bcCqHZdOsSyRKpF4Tdk4Q25yvSY30rgGuZmmcycU0Jkn3Bvfa+Cfc4iP?= =?us-ascii?q?/xLjSP6dITdmi3Jhf7KynxOy/lW4xu39UMm7zkpKozJYntXQsn0BzQHf58abRv?= =?us-ascii?q?dn40utxzeC2xrN5uxKP0w4ja/bJIQgwr40mJoTq0PDHirulUXujK+Wd0Ek+umw?= =?us-ascii?q?6+T/fLrqvJGdOJVuigH5K6Quh82/DvoiMggVRGWb4ue81b3l/ULnXLVGlOY5nb?= =?us-ascii?q?fBvJDAOcsbvrK5AxNS0os78Ba/DjKm384CnXkEN19FYxOHj43zNFHUI/D0F+uw?= =?us-ascii?q?jE60mjdx2//GJqHhAonKLnXbn7fuYK1y51dEyAUp0dBQ+5JUBa8aIP/oQU/xs8?= =?us-ascii?q?HYDgUlPAOqzefoEs992Z0EVWKIGK+ZP/CajVjd3eMqJO/EQYYPszb8Y6w+5vvn?= =?us-ascii?q?l3wRgl4YdLOqm5AePjTwEfhsZl2QfXHsj8wpCmAXpAEzU+XwhRuFSzEASWy1Wv?= =?us-ascii?q?cE5jA/CZq+AM/8T5qqmaGA0T2gVslOZmFCC0iUHDH3fp+DQuoNZTiJCtRigzoJ?= =?us-ascii?q?Sf6rRtlyhlmVqAbmxu8/faLv8SoCuMe72Q=3D=3D?= X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2CiBgC+RP9a/+h+gm1dHgEGDINDQoEch?= =?us-ascii?q?ByIY44UMQFdkzaBeAsrAYRAAoIQIjYWAQIBAQEBAQECAWsogjUiglIBBSMzMwg?= =?us-ascii?q?DDgoCAiYCAjkeBgGFOqkhghyEWYNugieBCYkAP4Qbh3OCVAKRFIc4BwKBZ4xwj?= =?us-ascii?q?H2Qd4ElIwEwgVJtgxeQTz2BPQgMAY5bAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2CiBgC+RP9a/+h+gm1dHgEGDINDQoEchByIY44UMQFdkza?= =?us-ascii?q?BeAsrAYRAAoIQIjYWAQIBAQEBAQECAWsogjUiglIBBSMzMwgDDgoCAiYCAjkeB?= =?us-ascii?q?gGFOqkhghyEWYNugieBCYkAP4Qbh3OCVAKRFIc4BwKBZ4xwjH2Qd4ElIwEwgVJ?= =?us-ascii?q?tgxeQTz2BPQgMAY5bAQE?= Received: from 232.126-130-109.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO md) ([109.130.126.232]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 May 2018 23:29:30 +0200 Message-ID: <1526678970.1604.7.camel@skynet.be> Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] Implenent 'frame apply COMMAND', enhance 'thread apply COMMAND' From: Philippe Waroquiers To: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 22:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: <20180505192804.12731-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-05/txt/msg00429.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2018-05-17 at 22:14 -0400, Simon Marchi wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > I think this is really nice. I was really amazed by "thread apply all frame apply all", > simple but powerful. > > As noted in my other message, I am not sure if it's a good idea to have similar syntax > but different semantic for "thread apply" and "frame apply", it might confuse more > than anything. I'm curious to know what you think about it. Other than that, I don't > have any strong opinion on the syntax, it seems fine to me. > > Simon Hello Simon, There are a few comments to which I will reply specifically in the various mails. The other non discussed comments are all clear to me, and I should be able to handle them for the next version. Thanks for the review. Philippe