From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com>
To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com>, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa] Re: The problem with stabs and sign extension
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:01:00 -0000
Message-id: <15226.51428.874589.613358@krustylu.cygnus.com>
References: <20010808141207.A31287@nevyn.them.org> <20010808161421.A3360@lucon.org> <20010808165359.A3964@lucon.org> <20010808170326.A4132@lucon.org> <20010808171616.A7610@nevyn.them.org> <15226.868.740336.451345@krustylu.cygnus.com> <20010814220449.A14607@lucon.org>
X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00183.html

H . J . Lu writes:
 > On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 01:06:44AM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote:
 > > 
 > > This looks ok to me, can you commit it? Should we commit it to the 5.1
 > 
 > I checked it in.
 > 
 > > branch as well? How many targets is it going to affect? Just mips, right?
 > > Probably yes then. 
 > > 
 > 
 > Only mips has sign extended vma. I'd like to see it in gdb 5.1. I have
 > to apply it when I use gdb on mips.


It is probably OK. Do you or Daniel want to check it in?

Elena


 > 
 > 
 > H.J.