From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Elena Zannoni To: Michael Snyder Cc: Andrew Cagney , Daniel Berlin , ezannoni@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: completion.exp: what is "a64l"? Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 12:29:00 -0000 Message-id: <15209.44021.611482.48798@krustylu.cygnus.com> References: <3B68927F.64EE5475@cygnus.com> <877kwn1glg.fsf@cgsoftware.com> <3B68AAE4.70805@cygnus.com> <3B69A211.B20C1E73@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00046.html Michael Snyder writes: > Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > > ``a64l, l64a, l64a_r - convert between a long integer and a base-64 > > ASCII string'' > > Is there any reason why a GDB test for completion > should require the presence of this symbol? No, read further in the thread. You can even change the completion test. Pick another letter that is not 'a' and that makes more sense for the file we are debugging. Elena