Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] Remove addr_size field from struct piece_closure
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 17:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491586736-21296-5-git-send-email-arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1491586736-21296-1-git-send-email-arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The addr_size field in the piece_closure data structure is a relic from
before introducing the typed DWARF stack.  It is obsolete now.  This patch
removes it.

gdb/ChangeLog:

	* dwarf2loc.c (struct piece_closure) <addr_size>: Remove field.
	(allocate_piece_closure): Drop addr_size parameter.
	(dwarf2_evaluate_loc_desc_full): Adjust call to
	allocate_piece_closure.
---
 gdb/dwarf2loc.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2loc.c b/gdb/dwarf2loc.c
index 09938c4..76a58a3 100644
--- a/gdb/dwarf2loc.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2loc.c
@@ -1485,9 +1485,6 @@ struct piece_closure
   /* The number of pieces used to describe this variable.  */
   int n_pieces;
 
-  /* The target address size, used only for DWARF_VALUE_STACK.  */
-  int addr_size;
-
   /* The pieces themselves.  */
   struct dwarf_expr_piece *pieces;
 
@@ -1502,7 +1499,7 @@ struct piece_closure
 static struct piece_closure *
 allocate_piece_closure (struct dwarf2_per_cu_data *per_cu,
 			int n_pieces, struct dwarf_expr_piece *pieces,
-			int addr_size, struct frame_info *frame)
+			struct frame_info *frame)
 {
   struct piece_closure *c = XCNEW (struct piece_closure);
   int i;
@@ -1510,7 +1507,6 @@ allocate_piece_closure (struct dwarf2_per_cu_data *per_cu,
   c->refc = 1;
   c->per_cu = per_cu;
   c->n_pieces = n_pieces;
-  c->addr_size = addr_size;
   c->pieces = XCNEWVEC (struct dwarf_expr_piece, n_pieces);
   if (frame == NULL)
     c->frame_id = null_frame_id;
@@ -2412,7 +2408,7 @@ dwarf2_evaluate_loc_desc_full (struct type *type, struct frame_info *frame,
 	invalid_synthetic_pointer ();
 
       c = allocate_piece_closure (per_cu, ctx.num_pieces, ctx.pieces,
-				  ctx.addr_size, frame);
+				  frame);
       /* We must clean up the value chain after creating the piece
 	 closure but before allocating the result.  */
       free_values.free_to_mark ();
-- 
2.3.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-07 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-07 17:39 [PATCH 0/9] Various DWARF piece fixes Andreas Arnez
2017-04-07 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/9] Add test for modifiable DWARF locations Andreas Arnez
2017-04-13  4:00   ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-13 10:52     ` Andreas Arnez
2017-04-13  8:36   ` Yao Qi
2017-04-13 11:46     ` Andreas Arnez
2017-04-07 17:40 ` [PATCH 2/9] Fix size capping in write_pieced_value Andreas Arnez
2017-04-13  8:18   ` Yao Qi
2017-04-13 16:35     ` Andreas Arnez
2017-04-19  9:15       ` Yao Qi
2017-04-19 14:36         ` Andreas Arnez
2017-04-19 15:00           ` Yao Qi
2017-04-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 3/9] PR gdb/21226: Take DWARF stack value pieces from LSB end Andreas Arnez
2017-04-14  3:36   ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-18 16:32     ` Andreas Arnez
2017-04-18 16:43       ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-07 17:41 ` Andreas Arnez [this message]
2017-04-13  9:10   ` [PATCH 4/9] Remove addr_size field from struct piece_closure Yao Qi
2017-04-14  3:39     ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-18 17:25       ` Andreas Arnez
2017-04-18 18:49         ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-07 17:42 ` [PATCH 5/9] Fix issues in write_pieced_value when targeting bit-fields Andreas Arnez
2017-04-14  5:18   ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-27 17:54     ` Andreas Arnez
2017-05-03 13:59       ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-07 17:43 ` [PATCH 6/9] Fix handling of DWARF register pieces on big-endian targets Andreas Arnez
2017-04-14 14:11   ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-19 18:03     ` Andreas Arnez
2017-04-07 17:43 ` [PATCH 7/9] Improve logic for buffer allocation in read/write_pieced_value Andreas Arnez
2017-04-14 14:51   ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-07 17:44 ` [PATCH 8/9] Respect piece offset for DW_OP_bit_piece Andreas Arnez
2017-04-14 15:07   ` Simon Marchi
2017-04-07 17:45 ` [PATCH 9/9] Remove unnecessary copies of variables in read/write_pieced_value Andreas Arnez
2017-04-14 15:21   ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1491586736-21296-5-git-send-email-arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox