From: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH] btrace: preserve call stack on function switch
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 09:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1485940343-29405-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> (raw)
On 64-bit FC25, the _dl_runtime_resolve function uses a conditional branch to
'call' a particular variant optimized for that system:
(gdb) disas _dl_runtime_resolve_avx_opt
Dump of assembler code for function _dl_runtime_resolve_avx_opt:
0x00007ffff7deeb60 <+0>: push %rax
0x00007ffff7deeb61 <+1>: push %rcx
0x00007ffff7deeb62 <+2>: push %rdx
0x00007ffff7deeb63 <+3>: mov $0x1,%ecx
0x00007ffff7deeb68 <+8>: xgetbv
0x00007ffff7deeb6b <+11>: mov %eax,%r11d
0x00007ffff7deeb6e <+14>: pop %rdx
0x00007ffff7deeb6f <+15>: pop %rcx
0x00007ffff7deeb70 <+16>: pop %rax
0x00007ffff7deeb71 <+17>: and $0x4,%r11d
0x00007ffff7deeb75 <+21>: bnd je 0x7ffff7def4a0 <_dl_runtime_resolve_sse_vex>
End of assembler dump.
When computing the function-level trace, btrace treats this as a switch from
_dl_runtime_resolve_avx_opt to _dl_runtime_resolve_sse_vex. We know that we
switched functions but we can't really say in which caller/callee relationship
those two functions are.
In addition to preserving the indentaion level, also preserve the caller
information. This is a heuristic since we don't really know. But at least in
this case, this seems to be the right thing to do.
This fixes a fail in gdb.btrace/rn-dl-bind.exp on 64-bit FC25.
2017-02-01 Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
* btrace.c (ftrace_new_switch): Preserve up link and flags.
---
gdb/btrace.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/btrace.c b/gdb/btrace.c
index 6d621e4..ddf6692 100644
--- a/gdb/btrace.c
+++ b/gdb/btrace.c
@@ -448,9 +448,11 @@ ftrace_new_switch (struct btrace_function *prev,
{
struct btrace_function *bfun;
- /* This is an unexplained function switch. The call stack will likely
- be wrong at this point. */
+ /* This is an unexplained function switch. We can't really be sure about the
+ call stack, yet the best I can think of right now is to preserve it. */
bfun = ftrace_new_function (prev, mfun, fun);
+ bfun->up = prev->up;
+ bfun->flags = prev->flags;
ftrace_debug (bfun, "new switch");
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2017-02-01 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-01 9:12 Markus Metzger [this message]
2017-02-06 23:56 ` Luis Machado
2017-02-07 7:27 ` Metzger, Markus T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1485940343-29405-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
--to=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox