From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id qxk0GkJC61+eZAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 09:50:42 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5D6981F0AA; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 09:50:42 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95F231E552 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 09:50:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CA6384B011; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:50:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E9CA6384B011 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1609253441; bh=uYjGqkt2Qt3h8XlRr1oVBc1lR3/viLbA7Fi0TJPJ1Y8=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=I6K4qgXUcZ11pQwUJZ9UFNxKVvfICChAvHfr6XyVymoWP/HUVBVhGgaFR3TOAe9c+ pU1okHWT7MEayeYu7uF3zPBe7Vw83nQVjQMPJLDXR5ZDCsTWqKOnvBd2PGyLOHXxeQ acoMATFcrXO2QqZ38DMsfWUFCVvB87pV0FZJpntA= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70248384B011 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:50:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 70248384B011 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 0BTEoGe5023704 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 29 Dec 2020 09:50:20 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 0BTEoGe5023704 Received: from [10.0.0.213] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92E3C1E552; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 09:50:15 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Enable GDB build with in-tree GMP and MPFR To: Bernd Edlinger , Joel Brobecker References: <71f5437f-c4f5-b58d-06f7-67a4d0b31007@simark.ca> <214e9564-5dfd-65a2-c2d8-6e8398ebc913@simark.ca> <87o8iw9ilx.fsf@tromey.com> <20201215023315.GK3461@adacore.com> <4ea7575a-b727-d9b7-e510-5c8b942f77f9@polymtl.ca> <20201216073333.GA934694@adacore.com> <89e6d36b-7a4b-4eed-69bd-fa82add4dab0@polymtl.ca> Message-ID: <1451a5d1-97e4-3c37-030f-f2808249b100@polymtl.ca> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 09:50:15 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:50:16 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Cc: Pedro Alves , Tom Tromey , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2020-12-29 3:36 a.m., Bernd Edlinger wrote: > Okay, I also like the second variant better. > > Can I assume that you agree to that variant? > > If yes, then I should send the patch regarding the > toplevel configury change also to the binutils mailing list, > right? I do prefer the second variant over the first one, because it's simpler. But I prefer having none of them, and just having a built mpfr/gmp be a prerequisite step to building GDB. Simon