From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH] Run gdb.base/sizeof.exp with board having gdb,noinferiorio
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 13:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448977402-9487-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> (raw)
In my remote cross testing (x86_64 host and aarch64 target), the test
gdb.base/sizeof.exp is skipped because gdb,noinferiorio is defined in
my gdbserver board file. Tests are skipped because the test checks
the expected value from the program's output, but I don't see why must
do it this way. With my patch applied, we can save the result in variable
in the program, and check the variable then. Then, the test doesn't rely
on inferiorio. However, in check_valueof, the value is still checked by
printing from the program, because I don't know why do we test in this
way, so I leave them there. With boards having gdb,noinferiorio, these
check_valueof tests are unsupported. The rest of tests can be run
unconditionally.
gdb/testsuite:
2015-12-01 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* gdb.base/sizeof.c (main): New variable 'size'. Remove printf.
Assign return value to size.
* gdb.base/sizeof.exp: Remove the checking to gdb,noinferiorio
at the beginning.
(check_sizeof): Check the result by printing variable 'size'.
(check_valueof): Do the test if gdb,noinferiorio doesn't exist,
otherwise mark the test unsupported.
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sizeof.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sizeof.exp | 28 +++++++++++-----------------
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sizeof.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sizeof.c
index eb21f22..86deff5 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sizeof.c
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sizeof.c
@@ -100,22 +100,22 @@ fill_structs (void)
int
main ()
{
+ int size;
+
gdb_unbuffer_output ();
fill_structs ();
- printf ("sizeof (char) == %d\n", (int) sizeof (char));
- printf ("sizeof (short) == %d\n", (int) sizeof (short));
- printf ("sizeof (int) == %d\n", (int) sizeof (int));
- printf ("sizeof (long) == %d\n", (int) sizeof (long));
- printf ("sizeof (long long) == %d\n", (int) sizeof (long long));
-
- printf ("sizeof (void *) == %d\n", (int) sizeof (void*));
- printf ("sizeof (void (*)(void)) == %d\n", (int) sizeof (void (*)(void)));
-
- printf ("sizeof (float) == %d\n", (int) sizeof (float));
- printf ("sizeof (double) == %d\n", (int) sizeof (double));
- printf ("sizeof (long double) == %d\n", (int) sizeof (long double));
+ size = (int) sizeof (char);
+ size = (int) sizeof (short);
+ size = (int) sizeof (int);
+ size = (int) sizeof (long);
+ size = (int) sizeof (long long);
+ size = (int) sizeof (void*);
+ size = (int) sizeof (void (*)(void));
+ size = (int) sizeof (float);
+ size = (int) sizeof (double);
+ size = (int) sizeof (long double);
/* Signed char? */
printf ("valueof ('\\377') == %d\n", '\377');
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sizeof.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sizeof.exp
index ce6b7ed..776fc9b 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sizeof.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sizeof.exp
@@ -15,11 +15,6 @@
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
-if [target_info exists gdb,noinferiorio] {
- verbose "Skipping sizeof.exp because of no fileio capabilities."
- continue
-}
-
#
# test running programs
#
@@ -68,12 +63,8 @@ set sizeof_long_double [get_sizeof "long double" 8]
#
proc check_sizeof { type size } {
- global gdb_prompt
-
- set pat [string_to_regexp "sizeof (${type}) == ${size}\r\n"]
- gdb_test_stdio "next" "${pat}" \
- "\[0-9\].*" \
- "check sizeof \"$type\""
+ gdb_test "next" "" ""
+ gdb_test "p size" " = ${size}" "check sizeof \"$type\""
}
check_sizeof "char" ${sizeof_char}
@@ -90,12 +81,15 @@ check_sizeof "double" ${sizeof_double}
check_sizeof "long double" ${sizeof_long_double}
proc check_valueof { exp val } {
- global gdb_prompt
-
- set pat [string_to_regexp "valueof (${exp}) == ${val}\r\n"]
- gdb_test_stdio "next" "${pat}" \
- "\[0-9\].*" \
- "check valueof \"$exp\""
+ if [target_info exists gdb,noinferiorio] {
+ gdb_test "next" "" ""
+ unsupported "check valueof \"$exp\""
+ } else {
+ set pat [string_to_regexp "valueof (${exp}) == ${val}\r\n"]
+ gdb_test_stdio "next" "${pat}" \
+ "\[0-9\].*" \
+ "check valueof \"$exp\""
+ }
}
# Check that GDB and the target agree over the sign of a character.
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-12-01 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-01 13:43 Yao Qi [this message]
2015-12-03 13:10 ` Pedro Alves
2015-12-03 15:49 ` Yao Qi
2015-12-03 15:50 ` Pedro Alves
2015-12-03 17:13 ` Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448977402-9487-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org \
--to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox