From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19365 invoked by alias); 7 May 2003 11:01:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19354 invoked from network); 7 May 2003 11:01:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bilbo.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.18) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 May 2003 11:01:39 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (tony08-235-52.inter.net.il [80.230.235.52] (may be forged)) by bilbo.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.2-GA) with ESMTP id AOB51053; Wed, 7 May 2003 13:59:20 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 11:01:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: brobecker@gnat.com Message-Id: <1438-Wed07May2003135554+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20030507014231.GA3156@gnat.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Tue, 6 May 2003 18:42:31 -0700) Subject: Re: [RFA] Add new language: "unsupported" Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20030507014231.GA3156@gnat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 18:42:31 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > > Basically, I added a new "unsupported" language which support is > minimalistic (identical to what we do with the "asm" language). Thanks. I think we need to say something about this in the manual. A user who sees "currently unsupported" should be able to understand what that means, in practice. > But I'm not such a big fan of "unsupported" > either, so all suggestions are welcome. How about "unknown" or "generic"?