From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [obish?sym;rfa:doc] Wire up vsyscall Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 05:59:00 -0000 Message-id: <1438-Tue18May2004085728+0300-eliz@gnu.org> References: <409A8C2A.2010605@gnu.org> <40A91C36.7000900@gnu.org> <20040517131914.332fa347@saguaro> X-SW-Source: 2004-05/msg00523.html > Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 13:19:14 -0700 > From: Kevin Buettner > > On Mon, 17 May 2004 16:10:30 -0400 > Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > +@deftypefun void inferior_created (struct target_ops *@var{objfile}, int @var{from_tty}) > > +@var{GDBN} has just created to a new inferior. For @samp{run}, it is > > +called while the inferior is still stopped at the entry-point > > +instruction. For @samp{attach} and @samp{core}, it is called > > +immediatly after opening the inferior (and before any information on > > +the inferior has been printed). > > +@end deftypefun > > s/immediatly/immediately/ Oops, missed the original message. Andrew, in addition to the typo caught by Kevin, please correct the wording some more, viz.: - "@var{GDBN}" should be "@value{GDBN}". - "has just created to a new inferior" is unclear and incorrect English. Sounds like some word is missing or should be deleted. - The "it" in "For @samp{run}", it is called ..." is not very clear; I think "For @samp{run}, this observer is called ..." is better. - "after opening the inferior" is possibly inaccurate: GDB doesn't really ``open'' the inferior, right?