From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16621 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2004 19:32:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16613 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2004 19:32:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2004 19:32:31 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.157.53]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.4-GR) with ESMTP id BMH19183; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:32:08 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Kevin Buettner Message-Id: <1438-Tue16Mar2004212955+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040315143549.600814b6@saguaro> (message from Kevin Buettner on Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:35:49 -0700) Subject: Re: [RFC] breakpoint.c: Don't let adjust_breakpoint_address() adjust watchpoints Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040315133002.0d21df91@saguaro> <8011-Mon15Mar2004230512+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <20040315143549.600814b6@saguaro> X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00360.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:35:49 -0700 > From: Kevin Buettner > > > > I'd like to hear more details. When do we need to adjust the > > breakpoint address, for starters? > > We have some documentation about this in gdbint.texinfo: > > The FR-V target (see @file{frv-tdep.c}) requires this method. Ah, yes, thanks for reminding me about that, and for explaining the rationale for the patch. I have no objections for it to go in. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16621 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2004 19:32:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16613 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2004 19:32:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2004 19:32:31 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.157.53]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.4-GR) with ESMTP id BMH19183; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:32:08 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:32:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Kevin Buettner Message-ID: <1438-Tue16Mar2004212955+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040315143549.600814b6@saguaro> (message from Kevin Buettner on Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:35:49 -0700) Subject: Re: [RFC] breakpoint.c: Don't let adjust_breakpoint_address() adjust watchpoints Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040315133002.0d21df91@saguaro> <8011-Mon15Mar2004230512+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <20040315143549.600814b6@saguaro> X-SW-Source: 2004-03.o/txt/msg00360.txt Message-ID: <20040316193200.N6BuX6YdogWQE7Txu-FEql4s8WgnpjTrBO4NNaEpWEg@z> > Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:35:49 -0700 > From: Kevin Buettner > > > > I'd like to hear more details. When do we need to adjust the > > breakpoint address, for starters? > > We have some documentation about this in gdbint.texinfo: > > The FR-V target (see @file{frv-tdep.c}) requires this method. Ah, yes, thanks for reminding me about that, and for explaining the rationale for the patch. I have no objections for it to go in.