Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 15/17] PPC64: Fix gdb.arch/ppc64-atomic-inst.exp with displaced stepping
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1429267521-21047-16-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429267521-21047-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com>

The ppc64 displaced step code can't handle atomic sequences.  Fallback
to stepping over the breakpoint in-line if we detect one.

gdb/ChangeLog:
2015-04-17  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	* infrun.c (displaced_step_prepare): Return -1 if
	gdbarch_displaced_step_copy_insn returns NULL.
	(resume): When displaced stepping doesn't work, try software
	single-stepping.
	* rs6000-tdep.c (LWARX_MASK, LWARX_INSTRUCTION, LDARX_INSTRUCTION)
	(STWCX_MASK, STWCX_INSTRUCTION, STDCX_INSTRUCTION): Move higher up
	in file.
	(ppc_displaced_step_copy_insn): New function.
	(ppc_displaced_step_fixup): Update comment.
	(rs6000_gdbarch_init): Install ppc_displaced_step_copy_insn as
	gdbarch_displaced_step_copy_insn hook.
	* gdbarch.sh (displaced_step_copy_insn): Document what happens on
	NULL return.
	* gdbarch.h: Regenerate.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-04-17  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	* gdb.arch/ppc64-atomic-inst.exp (do_test): New procedure, move
	tests here.
	(top level): Run do_test with and without displaced stepping.

v3:

   - Document that gdbarch_displaced_step_copy_insn can return NULL.
---
 gdb/gdbarch.h                                |  6 ++-
 gdb/gdbarch.sh                               |  4 ++
 gdb/infrun.c                                 | 11 +++--
 gdb/rs6000-tdep.c                            | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/ppc64-atomic-inst.exp | 50 ++++++++++++--------
 5 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch.h b/gdb/gdbarch.h
index c94c19c..b02225a 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbarch.h
+++ b/gdb/gdbarch.h
@@ -923,7 +923,11 @@ extern void set_gdbarch_max_insn_length (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, ULONGEST max_i
   
    If your architecture doesn't need to adjust instructions before
    single-stepping them, consider using simple_displaced_step_copy_insn
-   here. */
+   here.
+  
+   If the instruction cannot execute out of line, return NULL.  The
+   core falls back to stepping past the instruction in-line instead in
+   that case. */
 
 extern int gdbarch_displaced_step_copy_insn_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch);
 
diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch.sh b/gdb/gdbarch.sh
index 0f303a4..749cbda 100755
--- a/gdb/gdbarch.sh
+++ b/gdb/gdbarch.sh
@@ -763,6 +763,10 @@ V:ULONGEST:max_insn_length:::0:0
 # If your architecture doesn't need to adjust instructions before
 # single-stepping them, consider using simple_displaced_step_copy_insn
 # here.
+#
+# If the instruction cannot execute out of line, return NULL.  The
+# core falls back to stepping past the instruction in-line instead in
+# that case.
 M:struct displaced_step_closure *:displaced_step_copy_insn:CORE_ADDR from, CORE_ADDR to, struct regcache *regs:from, to, regs
 
 # Return true if GDB should use hardware single-stepping to execute
diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c
index be186a7..a89eefc 100644
--- a/gdb/infrun.c
+++ b/gdb/infrun.c
@@ -1797,9 +1797,14 @@ displaced_step_prepare_throw (ptid_t ptid)
 
   closure = gdbarch_displaced_step_copy_insn (gdbarch,
 					      original, copy, regcache);
-
-  /* We don't support the fully-simulated case at present.  */
-  gdb_assert (closure);
+  if (closure == NULL)
+    {
+      /* The architecture doesn't know how or want to displaced step
+	 this instruction or instruction sequence.  Fallback to
+	 stepping over the breakpoint in-line.  */
+      do_cleanups (old_cleanups);
+      return -1;
+    }
 
   /* Save the information we need to fix things up if the step
      succeeds.  */
diff --git a/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c b/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c
index a125000..6106029 100644
--- a/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/rs6000-tdep.c
@@ -974,6 +974,61 @@ rs6000_breakpoint_from_pc (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR *bp_addr,
 #define BXL_INSN 0x4c000000
 #define BP_INSN 0x7C000008
 
+/* Instruction masks used during single-stepping of atomic
+   sequences.  */
+#define LWARX_MASK 0xfc0007fe
+#define LWARX_INSTRUCTION 0x7c000028
+#define LDARX_INSTRUCTION 0x7c0000A8
+#define STWCX_MASK 0xfc0007ff
+#define STWCX_INSTRUCTION 0x7c00012d
+#define STDCX_INSTRUCTION 0x7c0001ad
+
+/* We can't displaces step atomic sequenes.  Otherwise this is just
+   simple_displaced_step_copy_insn.  */
+
+static struct displaced_step_closure *
+ppc_displaced_step_copy_insn (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
+			      CORE_ADDR from, CORE_ADDR to,
+			      struct regcache *regs)
+{
+  size_t len = gdbarch_max_insn_length (gdbarch);
+  gdb_byte *buf = xmalloc (len);
+  struct cleanup *old_chain = make_cleanup (xfree, buf);
+  enum bfd_endian byte_order = gdbarch_byte_order (gdbarch);
+  int insn;
+
+  read_memory (from, buf, len);
+
+  insn = extract_signed_integer (buf, PPC_INSN_SIZE, byte_order);
+
+  /* Assume all atomic sequences start with a lwarx/ldarx instruction.  */
+  if ((insn & LWARX_MASK) == LWARX_INSTRUCTION
+      || (insn & LWARX_MASK) == LDARX_INSTRUCTION)
+    {
+      if (debug_displaced)
+	{
+	  fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
+			      "displaced: can't displaced step "
+			      "atomic sequence at %s\n",
+			      paddress (gdbarch, from));
+	}
+      do_cleanups (old_chain);
+      return NULL;
+    }
+
+  write_memory (to, buf, len);
+
+  if (debug_displaced)
+    {
+      fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "displaced: copy %s->%s: ",
+                          paddress (gdbarch, from), paddress (gdbarch, to));
+      displaced_step_dump_bytes (gdb_stdlog, buf, len);
+    }
+
+  discard_cleanups (old_chain);
+  return (struct displaced_step_closure *) buf;
+}
+
 /* Fix up the state of registers and memory after having single-stepped
    a displaced instruction.  */
 static void
@@ -983,8 +1038,7 @@ ppc_displaced_step_fixup (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
 			  struct regcache *regs)
 {
   enum bfd_endian byte_order = gdbarch_byte_order (gdbarch);
-  /* Since we use simple_displaced_step_copy_insn, our closure is a
-     copy of the instruction.  */
+  /* Our closure is a copy of the instruction.  */
   ULONGEST insn  = extract_unsigned_integer ((gdb_byte *) closure,
 					      PPC_INSN_SIZE, byte_order);
   ULONGEST opcode = 0;
@@ -1077,14 +1131,6 @@ ppc_displaced_step_hw_singlestep (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
   return 1;
 }
 
-/* Instruction masks used during single-stepping of atomic sequences.  */
-#define LWARX_MASK 0xfc0007fe
-#define LWARX_INSTRUCTION 0x7c000028
-#define LDARX_INSTRUCTION 0x7c0000A8
-#define STWCX_MASK 0xfc0007ff
-#define STWCX_INSTRUCTION 0x7c00012d
-#define STDCX_INSTRUCTION 0x7c0001ad
-
 /* Checks for an atomic sequence of instructions beginning with a LWARX/LDARX
    instruction and ending with a STWCX/STDCX instruction.  If such a sequence
    is found, attempt to step through it.  A breakpoint is placed at the end of 
@@ -5923,7 +5969,7 @@ rs6000_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches)
 
   /* Setup displaced stepping.  */
   set_gdbarch_displaced_step_copy_insn (gdbarch,
-					simple_displaced_step_copy_insn);
+					ppc_displaced_step_copy_insn);
   set_gdbarch_displaced_step_hw_singlestep (gdbarch,
 					    ppc_displaced_step_hw_singlestep);
   set_gdbarch_displaced_step_fixup (gdbarch, ppc_displaced_step_fixup);
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/ppc64-atomic-inst.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/ppc64-atomic-inst.exp
index d251425..08518fb 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/ppc64-atomic-inst.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/ppc64-atomic-inst.exp
@@ -32,27 +32,41 @@ if { [prepare_for_testing ${testfile}.exp ${testfile} ${srcfile} {debug quiet}]
     return -1
 }
 
-if ![runto_main] then {
-    untested "could not run to main"
-    return -1
-}
+# The test proper.  DISPLACED is true if we should try with displaced
+# stepping.
+proc do_test { displaced } {
+    global decimal hex
+
+    if ![runto_main] then {
+	untested "could not run to main"
+	return -1
+    }
+
+    gdb_test_no_output "set displaced-stepping $displaced"
 
-set bp1 [gdb_get_line_number "lwarx"]
-gdb_breakpoint "$bp1" "Breakpoint $decimal at $hex" \
-  "Set the breakpoint at the start of the lwarx/stwcx sequence"
+    set bp1 [gdb_get_line_number "lwarx"]
+    gdb_breakpoint "$bp1" "Breakpoint $decimal at $hex" \
+	"Set the breakpoint at the start of the lwarx/stwcx sequence"
 
-set bp2 [gdb_get_line_number "ldarx"]
-gdb_breakpoint "$bp2" "Breakpoint $decimal at $hex" \
-  "Set the breakpoint at the start of the ldarx/stdcx sequence"
+    set bp2 [gdb_get_line_number "ldarx"]
+    gdb_breakpoint "$bp2" "Breakpoint $decimal at $hex" \
+	"Set the breakpoint at the start of the ldarx/stdcx sequence"
 
-gdb_test continue "Continuing.*Breakpoint $decimal.*" \
-  "Continue until lwarx/stwcx start breakpoint"
+    gdb_test continue "Continuing.*Breakpoint $decimal.*" \
+	"Continue until lwarx/stwcx start breakpoint"
 
-gdb_test nexti "bne.*1b" \
-  "Step through the lwarx/stwcx sequence"
+    gdb_test nexti "bne.*1b" \
+	"Step through the lwarx/stwcx sequence"
 
-gdb_test continue "Continuing.*Breakpoint $decimal.*" \
-  "Continue until ldarx/stdcx start breakpoint"
+    gdb_test continue "Continuing.*Breakpoint $decimal.*" \
+	"Continue until ldarx/stdcx start breakpoint"
 
-gdb_test nexti "bne.*1b" \
-  "Step through the ldarx/stdcx sequence"
+    gdb_test nexti "bne.*1b" \
+	"Step through the ldarx/stdcx sequence"
+}
+
+foreach displaced { "off" "on" } {
+    with_test_prefix "displaced=$displaced" {
+	do_test $displaced
+    }
+}
-- 
1.9.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-17 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-17 10:47 [PATCH v3 00/23] All-stop on top of non-stop Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] Change adjust_pc_after_break's prototype Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] Make thread_still_needs_step_over consider stepping_over_watchpoint too Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] Fix signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp on targets always in non-stop Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] Embed the pending step-over chain in thread_info objects Pedro Alves
2015-04-21  8:28   ` Yao Qi
2015-04-22 20:14     ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-21  9:53   ` Yao Qi
2015-04-22 19:07     ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-22  4:25   ` Doug Evans
2015-04-22 22:19     ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] Use keep_going in proceed and start_step_over too Pedro Alves
2015-04-22  5:09   ` Doug Evans
2015-04-22 22:22     ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] Fix step-over-{trips-on-watchpoint|lands-on-breakpoint}.exp race Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] remote.c/all-stop: Implement TARGET_WAITKIND_NO_RESUMED and TARGET_WNOHANG Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 10:45 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2015-04-21 11:21   ` [PATCH v3 15/17] PPC64: Fix gdb.arch/ppc64-atomic-inst.exp with displaced stepping Yao Qi
2015-04-22 20:04     ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] Factor out code to re-resume stepped thread Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] Misc switch_back_to_stepped_thread cleanups Pedro Alves
2015-04-21  9:50   ` Yao Qi
2015-04-22 20:04     ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-22  5:23   ` Doug Evans
2015-04-22 20:05     ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-28 20:28       ` Doug Evans
2015-04-17 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] native Linux: enable always non-stop by default Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 10:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] Fix and test "checkpoint" in non-stop mode Pedro Alves
2015-04-21  2:36   ` Doug Evans
2015-04-22 17:48     ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-28 18:18       ` Doug Evans
2015-04-29  4:56         ` Doug Evans
2015-05-19 18:08           ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 10:52 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] Fix interrupt-noterm.exp on targets always in non-stop Pedro Alves
2015-04-21 11:40   ` Yao Qi
2015-04-22 20:03     ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 10:52 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] Teach non-stop to do in-line step-overs (stop all, step, restart) Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 11:01   ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-21 15:01   ` Yao Qi
2015-04-22 20:03     ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-24  9:06       ` Yao Qi
2015-04-27 20:17   ` Doug Evans
2015-05-19 18:09     ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-19 18:49       ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 10:56 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] Disable displaced stepping if trying it fails Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 11:06 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] S/390: displaced stepping and PC-relative RIL-b/RIL-c instructions Pedro Alves
2015-04-17 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] Implement all-stop on top of a target running non-stop mode Pedro Alves
2015-04-21 11:09   ` Yao Qi
2015-04-22 20:16     ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-24  7:39       ` Yao Qi
2015-05-19 18:08         ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-21  9:17           ` Yao Qi
2015-04-20 12:02 ` [PATCH v3 00/23] All-stop on top of non-stop Yao Qi
2015-04-20 16:54   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
     [not found]     ` <553526D0.9030802@redhat.com>
2015-04-21  7:48       ` Yao Qi
2015-04-21 15:05         ` Yao Qi
2015-04-22 22:27           ` Pedro Alves
2015-04-20 17:35 ` Simon Marchi
2015-05-19 18:14   ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1429267521-21047-16-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox