From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 70909 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2015 13:39:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 70886 invoked by uid 89); 11 Mar 2015 13:39:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:39:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t2BDdsJW012386 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:39:54 -0400 Received: from blade.nx (ovpn-116-20.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.20]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t2BDdr75028015; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:39:54 -0400 Received: from blade.nx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blade.nx (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8DD265071; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:39:52 +0000 (GMT) From: Gary Benson To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Pedro Alves , Eli Zaretskii Subject: [PATCH 0/3 v2] Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:39:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1426081190-9381-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150311131601.GA5952@blade.nx> References: <20150311131601.GA5952@blade.nx> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2 Hi all, There's been a little too much to-and-fro on this series for me to keep track of. I *think* everything is approved now except for the documentation in patch 2/3. The various differences are documented in the individual mails. Built and regtested on RHEL 6.6 x86_64. Ok to commit? Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/