From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-138413-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 75625 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2017 18:27:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 75596 invoked by uid 89); 17 Apr 2017 18:27:45 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=stock
X-HELO: mail.baldwin.cx
Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (HELO mail.baldwin.cx) (96.47.65.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:27:43 +0000
Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104])	by mail.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29EB010A7B9;	Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:27:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PR threads/20743: Don't attempt to suspend or resume exited threads.
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:27:00 -0000
Message-ID: <14140503.xzYTI4WuLb@ralph.baldwin.cx>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.0-STABLE; KDE/4.14.10; amd64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <b7414b1d-ff19-23f2-8f35-c1dd0b1395e0@codesourcery.com>
References: <20170404173258.6512-1-jhb@FreeBSD.org> <6029590.iEtzOUCDnR@ralph.baldwin.cx> <b7414b1d-ff19-23f2-8f35-c1dd0b1395e0@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg00497.txt.bz2

On Friday, April 14, 2017 08:01:25 PM Luis Machado wrote:
> On 04/14/2017 05:40 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> Otherwise i have no further comments. I assume you ran gdb's testsuite
> >> against this change and verified the results are sane?
> >
> > There were no regressions at least.  With the stock tree there are
> > several unexpected failures already which I will get to at some point.
> >
> 
> Great. I have no further comments.

To be clear (since I believe I messed this up before), I still need approval
from an approver?

-- 
John Baldwin