[PATCH 2/5] ARM: extract_arm_insn function need to read instrs correctly in be8 case

[Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@linaro.org>]

extract_arm_insn function needs to read instructions in
gdbarch_byte_order_for_code byte order, because in case armv7b,
even data is big endian, instructions are still little endian.
Currently function uses gdbarch_byte_order which would be
big endian in armv7b case.

Because of this issue pretty much all gdb.reverse/ tests are
failing with 'Process record does not support instruction' message.

Fix is to change gdbarch_byte_order to gdbarch_byte_order_for_code,
when passed to extract_unsigned_integer that reads instruction.
---
 gdb/ChangeLog  | 5 +++++
 gdb/arm-tdep.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index c967a93..2aef5dc 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2014-10-13  Victor Kamensky  <victor.kamensky@linaro.org>
+
+	* arm-tdep.c (extract_arm_insn): use dbarch_byte_order_for_code
+	to read arm instruction.
+
 2014-09-30  Don Breazeal  <donb@codesourcery.com>
 
 	* inf-ptrace.c (inf_ptrace_follow_fork): Remove target-independent
diff --git a/gdb/arm-tdep.c b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
index e2559ec..e7a1ec5 100644
--- a/gdb/arm-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
@@ -13860,7 +13860,7 @@ extract_arm_insn (insn_decode_record *insn_record, uint32_t insn_size)
     return 1;
   insn_record->arm_insn = (uint32_t) extract_unsigned_integer (&buf[0],
                            insn_size, 
-                           gdbarch_byte_order (insn_record->gdbarch));
+			   gdbarch_byte_order_for_code (insn_record->gdbarch));
   return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.1.4