From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id lSLWJdTL5GAqTQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 17:32:04 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 8D7BF1F1F4; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:32:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1ACF1E54D for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:32:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BD1383D839 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 21:32:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 95BD1383D839 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1625607123; bh=6ERp3D3ZG4/vn0NF4WpbfmptOgPYwEDEL4A3lbOwKAI=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=vpsZ3ZXV/98xzlTeMCcUG9dHAt5qzbu+hARZfdzp8m+1yrJ+yl41vsUO3Uk0QNLK+ EMENBTUfXhlA1wLlsk+/+JEDNxxv5E0qXB0iWJQ8F/zHagdQMgxnTJflLOXO3rjVhx fftEd6ulc0zx8/99GR87X6XUL2Au1hoRjUQlDiTs= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CD09388F035 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 21:31:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 5CD09388F035 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 166LVYPT009433 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:31:39 -0400 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 166LVYPT009433 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4664E1E54D; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:31:34 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] gdb: maintain ptid -> thread map, optimize find_thread_ptid To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20210622165704.2404007-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> <20210622165704.2404007-11-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> Message-ID: <13bc15df-d474-dcb8-9aa0-29ca919e3ef1@polymtl.ca> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:31:34 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Tue, 6 Jul 2021 21:31:34 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > ( Should this have Co-Authored-By: ? ) Yes, and probably not just this patch. I'll go over the series and add them where needed. When picking up somebody else's patch like this, or the intrusive_list patch, is it better to keep the original author as the Author and add ourselves with Co-Authored-By, or set the "final" Author as the git Author and add previous Authors with Co-Authored-By? Simon