From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 71693 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2017 18:48:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 71570 invoked by uid 89); 10 Oct 2017 18:48:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=racy X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 18:48:27 +0000 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9A4B71E53D; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:48:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from simark.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4885F1E523; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:48:23 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 18:48:00 -0000 From: Simon Marchi To: Peeter Joot Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: review request: implementing DW_AT_endianity In-Reply-To: References: <0f87cf42-781d-4d70-a389-f4688cde109d@simark.ca> ,<534b7f80-c778-d5ca-3cee-1ccbab7bf257@simark.ca> , Message-ID: <13a6671101d28f7a2ff768f269c05a66@simark.ca> X-Sender: simark@simark.ca User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.0 X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00254.txt.bz2 On 2017-10-10 14:38, Peeter Joot wrote: About these: > -PASS: gdb.threads/process-dies-while-detaching.exp: single-process: > detach: killed outside: get integer valueof "mypid" (9535) > > +PASS: gdb.threads/process-dies-while-detaching.exp: single-process: > detach: killed outside: get integer valueof "mypid" (6194) It's weird that get_integer_valueof outputs the value in the test name. I can't remember see this variation, but it's bad anyhow. I'll post a patch for that. The rest seems to be known racy test cases (not saying it's good, just saying it's known). > (there were also the 4 additional PASS: records from my new test, and > no failures from that test). Looks good then! Simon