From: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
To: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, palves@redhat.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 16/29] frame, backtrace: allow targets to supply a frame unwinder
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1387471499-29444-17-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387471499-29444-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Allow targets to supply their own target-specific frame unwinders; one for
normal frames and one for tailcall frames. If a target-specific unwinder
is supplied, it will be chosen before any other unwinder.
The original patch has been split into this and the next two patches.
gdb/
2013-02-11 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* frame-unwind.c: Include target.h.
(frame_unwind_try_unwinder): New function with code from ...
(frame_unwind_find_by_frame): ... here. New variable
unwinder_from_target, call also target_get_unwinder)
(target_get_tailcall_unwinder, and frame_unwind_try_unwinder for it.
* target.c (target_get_unwinder, target_get_tailcall_unwinder): New.
* target.h (struct target_ops): New fields to_get_unwinder and
to_get_tailcall_unwinder.
(target_get_unwinder, target_get_tailcall_unwinder): New declarations.
---
gdb/frame-unwind.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
gdb/target.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++
gdb/target.h | 11 +++++++
3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/frame-unwind.c b/gdb/frame-unwind.c
index 8fabf52..e32f4b8 100644
--- a/gdb/frame-unwind.c
+++ b/gdb/frame-unwind.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include "exceptions.h"
#include "gdb_assert.h"
#include "gdb_obstack.h"
+#include "target.h"
static struct gdbarch_data *frame_unwind_data;
@@ -88,6 +89,48 @@ frame_unwind_append_unwinder (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
(*ip)->unwinder = unwinder;
}
+/* Call SNIFFER from UNWINDER. If it succeeded set UNWINDER for
+ THIS_FRAME and return 1. Otherwise the function keeps THIS_FRAME
+ unchanged and returns 0. */
+
+static int
+frame_unwind_try_unwinder (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **this_cache,
+ const struct frame_unwind *unwinder)
+{
+ struct cleanup *old_cleanup;
+ volatile struct gdb_exception ex;
+ int res = 0;
+
+ old_cleanup = frame_prepare_for_sniffer (this_frame, unwinder);
+
+ TRY_CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
+ {
+ res = unwinder->sniffer (unwinder, this_frame, this_cache);
+ }
+ if (ex.reason < 0 && ex.error == NOT_AVAILABLE_ERROR)
+ {
+ /* This usually means that not even the PC is available,
+ thus most unwinders aren't able to determine if they're
+ the best fit. Keep trying. Fallback prologue unwinders
+ should always accept the frame. */
+ do_cleanups (old_cleanup);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ else if (ex.reason < 0)
+ throw_exception (ex);
+ else if (res)
+ {
+ discard_cleanups (old_cleanup);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ do_cleanups (old_cleanup);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ gdb_assert_not_reached ("frame_unwind_try_unwinder");
+}
+
/* Iterate through sniffers for THIS_FRAME frame until one returns with an
unwinder implementation. THIS_FRAME->UNWIND must be NULL, it will get set
by this function. Possibly initialize THIS_CACHE. */
@@ -98,37 +141,24 @@ frame_unwind_find_by_frame (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **this_cache)
struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (this_frame);
struct frame_unwind_table *table = gdbarch_data (gdbarch, frame_unwind_data);
struct frame_unwind_table_entry *entry;
+ const struct frame_unwind *unwinder_from_target;
+
+ unwinder_from_target = target_get_unwinder ();
+ if (unwinder_from_target != NULL
+ && frame_unwind_try_unwinder (this_frame, this_cache,
+ unwinder_from_target))
+ return;
+
+ unwinder_from_target = target_get_tailcall_unwinder ();
+ if (unwinder_from_target != NULL
+ && frame_unwind_try_unwinder (this_frame, this_cache,
+ unwinder_from_target))
+ return;
for (entry = table->list; entry != NULL; entry = entry->next)
- {
- struct cleanup *old_cleanup;
- volatile struct gdb_exception ex;
- int res = 0;
-
- old_cleanup = frame_prepare_for_sniffer (this_frame, entry->unwinder);
-
- TRY_CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
- {
- res = entry->unwinder->sniffer (entry->unwinder, this_frame,
- this_cache);
- }
- if (ex.reason < 0 && ex.error == NOT_AVAILABLE_ERROR)
- {
- /* This usually means that not even the PC is available,
- thus most unwinders aren't able to determine if they're
- the best fit. Keep trying. Fallback prologue unwinders
- should always accept the frame. */
- }
- else if (ex.reason < 0)
- throw_exception (ex);
- else if (res)
- {
- discard_cleanups (old_cleanup);
- return;
- }
+ if (frame_unwind_try_unwinder (this_frame, this_cache, entry->unwinder))
+ return;
- do_cleanups (old_cleanup);
- }
internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, _("frame_unwind_find_by_frame failed"));
}
diff --git a/gdb/target.c b/gdb/target.c
index eb2d2d0..0759ae9 100644
--- a/gdb/target.c
+++ b/gdb/target.c
@@ -4469,6 +4469,34 @@ target_call_history_range (ULONGEST begin, ULONGEST end, int flags)
tcomplain ();
}
+/* See target.h. */
+
+const struct frame_unwind *
+target_get_unwinder (void)
+{
+ struct target_ops *t;
+
+ for (t = current_target.beneath; t != NULL; t = t->beneath)
+ if (t->to_get_unwinder != NULL)
+ return t->to_get_unwinder;
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/* See target.h. */
+
+const struct frame_unwind *
+target_get_tailcall_unwinder (void)
+{
+ struct target_ops *t;
+
+ for (t = current_target.beneath; t != NULL; t = t->beneath)
+ if (t->to_get_tailcall_unwinder != NULL)
+ return t->to_get_tailcall_unwinder;
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
static int
deprecated_debug_xfer_memory (CORE_ADDR memaddr, bfd_byte *myaddr, int len,
int write, struct mem_attrib *attrib,
diff --git a/gdb/target.h b/gdb/target.h
index f20407d..c415266 100644
--- a/gdb/target.h
+++ b/gdb/target.h
@@ -895,6 +895,11 @@ struct target_ops
non-empty annex. */
int (*to_augmented_libraries_svr4_read) (void);
+ /* Those unwinders are tried before any other arch unwinders. Use NULL if
+ it is not used. */
+ const struct frame_unwind *to_get_unwinder;
+ const struct frame_unwind *to_get_tailcall_unwinder;
+
int to_magic;
/* Need sub-structure for target machine related rather than comm related?
*/
@@ -1778,6 +1783,12 @@ extern char *target_fileio_read_stralloc (const char *filename);
extern int target_core_of_thread (ptid_t ptid);
+/* See to_get_unwinder in struct target_ops. */
+extern const struct frame_unwind *target_get_unwinder (void);
+
+/* See to_get_tailcall_unwinder in struct target_ops. */
+extern const struct frame_unwind *target_get_tailcall_unwinder (void);
+
/* Verify that the memory in the [MEMADDR, MEMADDR+SIZE) range matches
the contents of [DATA,DATA+SIZE). Returns 1 if there's a match, 0
if there's a mismatch, and -1 if an error is encountered while
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-19 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-19 16:45 [PATCH v9 00/29] record-btrace: reverse Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 10/29] btrace: increase buffer size Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 07/29] btrace: change branch trace data structure Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 29/29] record-btrace: add (reverse-)stepping support Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 17:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-12-19 20:10 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-20 14:37 ` Metzger, Markus T
2013-12-20 14:47 ` Metzger, Markus T
2013-12-20 16:31 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-20 16:07 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 01/29] btrace, test: fix multi-line btrace tests Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 18:01 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 23/29] record-btrace: provide target_find_new_threads method Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 19:32 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 20/29] target, breakpoint: allow insert/remove breakpoint to be forwarded Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 19:08 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 09/29] record-btrace: start counting at one Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 02/29] btrace, linux: fix memory leak when reading branch trace Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 19/29] record-btrace, frame: supply target-specific unwinder Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 11/29] record-btrace: optionally indent function call history Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 18:23 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-20 12:54 ` Metzger, Markus T
2013-12-20 16:47 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 03/29] btrace: uppercase btrace_read_type Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 04/29] gdbarch: add instruction predicate methods Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 20:19 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 24/29] record-btrace: add record goto target methods Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 17/29] frame, cfa: check unwind stop reason first Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 08/29] record-btrace: fix insn range in function call history Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 25/29] record-btrace: extend unwinder Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 14/29] target: add ops parameter to to_prepare_to_store method Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 18:30 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-19 21:13 ` Tom Tromey
2013-12-20 13:07 ` Metzger, Markus T
2013-12-20 15:13 ` Tom Tromey
2013-12-20 17:23 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 15/29] record-btrace: supply register target methods Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 13/29] btrace: add replay position to btrace thread info Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 28/29] target: allow decr_pc_after_break to be defined by the target Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 19:51 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 12/29] record-btrace: make ranges include begin and end Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 17:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 26/29] btrace, gdbserver: read branch trace incrementally Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` Markus Metzger [this message]
2013-12-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v9 16/29] frame, backtrace: allow targets to supply a frame unwinder Pedro Alves
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 06/29] frame: add frame_id_build_unavailable_stack_special Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 18:12 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 05/29] frame: add frame_is_tailcall function Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 20:19 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 18/29] frame: do not assume unwinding will succeed Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 21/29] record-btrace: provide xfer_partial target method Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 19:13 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-20 13:37 ` Metzger, Markus T
2013-12-20 13:54 ` Metzger, Markus T
2013-12-20 15:56 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-20 16:02 ` Pedro Alves
2014-01-13 17:11 ` Pedro Alves
2014-01-13 12:36 ` Metzger, Markus T
2014-01-13 16:47 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-19 19:26 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-20 13:32 ` Metzger, Markus T
2013-12-20 15:36 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 22/29] record-btrace: add to_wait and to_resume target methods Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH v9 27/29] record-btrace: show trace from enable location Markus Metzger
2013-12-19 20:23 ` [PATCH v9 00/29] record-btrace: reverse Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1387471499-29444-17-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
--to=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox