Re: [PATCH 01/18] poison "class"

Stan Shebs
2013-10-24T18:21:51Z

On 10/24/13 10:57 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> I strongly object to the deliberate misspelling of "class" that this
>> diff introduces. Unless we're actually make the decision to rewrite
>> GDB in C++ (to which I strongly object in the first place) I don't
>> think this (and other) uglification diffs should go in.
>
> I usually relate to that, but "klass" is quite commonly used, in C,
> C++, and other languages, so I don't think this does much damage to
> our code base in this particular instance.
>

In any case, this is resolved with distinct names in v2.0 of the patch.

Stan
stan@codesourcery.com