From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] [GDBserver]: Silence exits if GDB is connected through stdio.
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 19:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380309731-29881-3-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380309731-29881-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com>
After the previous patch, catch-syscall.exp still doesn't pass with
the native-stdio-gdbserver.exp board. We get:
(gdb) continue
Continuing.
Child exited with status 0
GDBserver exiting
[Inferior 1 (process 22721) exited normally]
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp: continue until exit (the program exited)
The problem is the whole "Child exited ... GDBserver exiting" output,
that comes out of GDBserver, and that the testsuite is not expecting.
In fact, the previous patch adds a bunch of regressions with this
board due to this, not just to catch-syscall.exp:
-PASS: gdb.arch/amd64-disp-step.exp: continue until exit at amd64-disp-step
+FAIL: gdb.arch/amd64-disp-step.exp: continue until exit at amd64-disp-step (the program exited)
-PASS: gdb.base/break.exp: continue until exit at recursive next test
+FAIL: gdb.base/break.exp: continue until exit at recursive next test (the program exited)
-PASS: gdb.base/chng-syms.exp: continue until exit at breakpoint first time through
+FAIL: gdb.base/chng-syms.exp: continue until exit at breakpoint first time through (the program exited)
... etc. ...
(I plan to swap the order of the patches before check in, to prevent
breaking bisects.)
I pondered somehow making the testsuite adjust to this. But,
testsuite aside, I think GDBserver should not be outputting this at
all when GDB is connected through stdio. GDBserver will be printing
this in GDB's console, but the user can already tell from the regular
output that the inferior is gone.
Again, manually:
(gdb) tar remote | ./gdbserver/gdbserver - program
Remote debugging using | ./gdbserver/gdbserver - program
Process program created; pid = 22486
stdin/stdout redirected
Remote debugging using stdio
done.
Loaded symbols for /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
0x000000323d001530 in _start () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Child exited with status 1
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
GDBserver exiting
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[Inferior 1 (process 22486) exited with code 01]
(gdb)
Suppressing those two lines makes the output be exactly like when
debugging against a remote tcp gdbserver:
(gdb) c
Continuing.
[Inferior 1 (process 22914) exited with code 01]
(gdb)
Comments?
2013-09-27 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* server.c (process_serial_event): Don't output "GDBserver
exiting" if GDB is connected through stdio.
* target.c (mywait): Likewise, be silent if GDB is connected
through stdio.
---
gdb/gdbserver/server.c | 5 ++++-
gdb/gdbserver/target.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/server.c b/gdb/gdbserver/server.c
index 4de20d5..e0af785 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbserver/server.c
+++ b/gdb/gdbserver/server.c
@@ -3550,7 +3550,10 @@ process_serial_event (void)
the whole vStopped list (until it gets an OK). */
if (QUEUE_is_empty (notif_event_p, notif_stop.queue))
{
- fprintf (stderr, "GDBserver exiting\n");
+ /* Be transparent when GDB is connected through stdio -- no
+ need to spam GDB's console. */
+ if (!remote_connection_is_stdio ())
+ fprintf (stderr, "GDBserver exiting\n");
remote_close ();
exit (0);
}
diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/target.c b/gdb/gdbserver/target.c
index 1a0dee2..64940e2 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbserver/target.c
+++ b/gdb/gdbserver/target.c
@@ -82,13 +82,22 @@ mywait (ptid_t ptid, struct target_waitstatus *ourstatus, int options,
ret = (*the_target->wait) (ptid, ourstatus, options);
- if (ourstatus->kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_EXITED)
- fprintf (stderr,
- "\nChild exited with status %d\n", ourstatus->value.integer);
- else if (ourstatus->kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_SIGNALLED)
- fprintf (stderr, "\nChild terminated with signal = 0x%x (%s)\n",
- gdb_signal_to_host (ourstatus->value.sig),
- gdb_signal_to_name (ourstatus->value.sig));
+ /* If GDB is connected through TCP/serial, then GDBserver will most
+ probably be running on its own terminal/console, so it's nice to
+ print there why is GDBserver existing. If however, GDB is
+ connected through stdio, then there's no need to spam the GDB
+ console with this -- the user will already see the exit through
+ regular GDB output, in that same terminal. */
+ if (!remote_connection_is_stdio ())
+ {
+ if (ourstatus->kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_EXITED)
+ fprintf (stderr,
+ "\nChild exited with status %d\n", ourstatus->value.integer);
+ else if (ourstatus->kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_SIGNALLED)
+ fprintf (stderr, "\nChild terminated with signal = 0x%x (%s)\n",
+ gdb_signal_to_host (ourstatus->value.sig),
+ gdb_signal_to_name (ourstatus->value.sig));
+ }
if (connected_wait)
server_waiting = 0;
--
1.7.11.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-27 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-27 19:22 [PATCH 0/2] Make catch-syscall.exp work with "target remote" Pedro Alves
2013-09-27 19:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] Make catch-syscall.exp work with "target remote". A.k.a., teach the testsuite that GDBserver reliably reports program exits Pedro Alves
2013-10-02 11:51 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-27 19:22 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2013-09-27 20:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] [GDBserver]: Silence exits if GDB is connected through stdio Sergio Durigan Junior
2013-10-02 11:49 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1380309731-29881-3-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox