From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2634 invoked by alias); 24 May 2007 20:37:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 2592 invoked by uid 22791); 24 May 2007 20:36:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (HELO mail-out3.apple.com) (17.254.13.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 May 2007 20:36:45 +0000 Received: from relay8.apple.com (relay8.apple.com [17.128.113.38]) by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3437620570D; Thu, 24 May 2007 13:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay8.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay8.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 15E9C40553; Thu, 24 May 2007 13:36:44 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807126-adfe3bb000003f8b-a0-4655f75cbe6c Received: from [17.201.24.248] (mrs1.apple.com [17.201.24.248]) by relay8.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id EFA654007B; Thu, 24 May 2007 13:36:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4655EF30.3080705@pop.agri.ch> References: <200705241735.KAA09881@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <4655EF30.3080705@pop.agri.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <1379D730-7EF4-4CA2-A914-57A67C83A576@apple.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Alexandre Oliva , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Patches" , Steve Ellcey , jjohnstn@redhat.com, libtool@cwilson.fastmail.fm, newlib@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mike Stump Subject: Re: New libtool is in the GCC and Src trees. Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 20:37:00 -0000 To: Andreas Tobler X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00382.txt.bz2 On May 24, 2007, at 1:01 PM, Andreas Tobler wrote: > Steve Ellcey wrote: >> The GCC and src trees have been updated with the new libtool. Let me >> know if you run into problems. > > gcc builds fail on Darwin. Attached a patch which cures the issue. > Ok? Ok. This is fine, as I think all the uses in gcc just use the built compiler, so it is safe. For other packages that don't include a compiler, I suspect the patch might break compiles on older systems.