Re: [PATCH 5/7] New lang-varobj.h

Yao Qi
2013-10-09T23:51:46Z

On 10/08/2013 12:59 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> >How about move lang-varobj.h into varobj.h?
> Not very important in the grand scheme of things, but I tend to agree
> with the suggestion. If we had a lang-varobj.c, things might be
> different. But for a simple definition of the language-specific ops
> directly related to varobj, I'd keep things simple, inside varobj.h.

We don't have lang-varobj.c, but we'll have c-varobj.c, jv-varobj.c and
ada-varobj.c [done by patch 6/7]. Is it strong enough to justify
creating new file lang-varobj.h?

--
Yao (é½å°§)