From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Only print entry values for arguments.
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1375663450-5825-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> (raw)
Hi,
When I think about how to handle entry values in my "skip unavailable"
patch, I played with "set print entry-values" to different values, and
use MI commands '-stack-list-{locals,arguments,variables}' to see the
changes on output. However, I find that "print entry-values" affects
the output of "-stack-list-locals", which is not expected.
-gdb-set print entry-values only
^done
-stack-list-locals --simple-values
^done,locals=[{name="array",type="unsigned char [2]"},{name="i@entry",type="int",value="<optimized out>"}]
-gdb-set print entry-values both
^done
-stack-list-locals --simple-values
^done,locals=[{name="array",type="unsigned char [2]"},{name="i",type="int",value="<unavailable>"},{name="i@entry",type="int",value="<optimized out>"}]
"print entry-values" is the option about printing frame arguments,
which has nothing to do with locals. This patch is to check whether it
is an argument to decide to call read_frame_arg or read_frame_local.
read_frame_local is a new function which is to print local without
considering much on "print entry-values". I have to say that it is
odd to pass "struct frame_arg *" to function read_frame_local, but it
is required by caller and the following calls. Functions
list_args_or_locals and list_arg_or_local process both arguments and
locals by means of "struct frame_arg *", so I have to use "struct
frame_arg *" for function read_frame_local too. Note that "print
entry-values" is for arguments only, but is checked in both
list_args_or_locals and list_arg_or_local. We need some changes here
to apply value of "print entry-values" to arguments only, but it is
not the goal of this patch.
The test case mi-trace-unavailable.exp is updated too, to test the
output of '-stack-list-locals'.
This patch also fixes an internal error I found,
../../../git/gdb/stack.c:223: internal-error: print_frame_arg: Assertion `!arg->val || !arg->error' failed.
A problem internal to GDB has been detected, further debugging may prove unreliable.
Quit this debugging session? "
Patch is tested on x86_64-linux with board file unix.exp and
native-gdbserver.exp.
gdb:
2013-08-05 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
* frame.h (read_frame_local): Declare.
* mi/mi-cmd-stack.c (list_args_or_locals): Call
read_frame_local.
* stack.c (read_frame_local): New.
gdb/testsuite:
2013-08-05 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
* gdb.trace/mi-trace-unavailable.exp: Don't set
"print entry-values" to "no".
(test_trace_unavailable): Set various values to
"print entry-values" to test the output of
'-stack-list-locals' is not affected.
---
gdb/frame.h | 2 +
gdb/mi/mi-cmd-stack.c | 5 +++-
gdb/stack.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++
gdb/testsuite/gdb.trace/mi-trace-unavailable.exp | 18 ++++++++++++--
4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/frame.h b/gdb/frame.h
index 31b9cb7..f02addf 100644
--- a/gdb/frame.h
+++ b/gdb/frame.h
@@ -714,6 +714,8 @@ struct frame_arg
extern void read_frame_arg (struct symbol *sym, struct frame_info *frame,
struct frame_arg *argp,
struct frame_arg *entryargp);
+extern void read_frame_local (struct symbol *sym, struct frame_info *frame,
+ struct frame_arg *argp);
extern void args_info (char *, int);
diff --git a/gdb/mi/mi-cmd-stack.c b/gdb/mi/mi-cmd-stack.c
index 416f0f4..fea7f6f 100644
--- a/gdb/mi/mi-cmd-stack.c
+++ b/gdb/mi/mi-cmd-stack.c
@@ -602,7 +602,10 @@ list_args_or_locals (enum what_to_list what, enum print_values values,
&& TYPE_CODE (type) != TYPE_CODE_UNION)
{
case PRINT_ALL_VALUES:
- read_frame_arg (sym2, fi, &arg, &entryarg);
+ if (SYMBOL_IS_ARGUMENT (sym))
+ read_frame_arg (sym2, fi, &arg, &entryarg);
+ else
+ read_frame_local (sym2, fi, &arg);
}
break;
}
diff --git a/gdb/stack.c b/gdb/stack.c
index 510f20d..9e9ebc1 100644
--- a/gdb/stack.c
+++ b/gdb/stack.c
@@ -301,6 +301,33 @@ print_frame_arg (const struct frame_arg *arg)
annotate_arg_end ();
}
+/* Read in inferior function local SYM at FRAM into ARGP. Caller is
+ responsible for xfree of ARGP->ERROR. This function never throws an
+ exception. */
+
+void
+read_frame_local (struct symbol *sym, struct frame_info *frame,
+ struct frame_arg *argp)
+{
+ volatile struct gdb_exception except;
+ struct value *val = NULL;
+ char *val_error = NULL;
+
+ TRY_CATCH (except, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
+ {
+ val = read_var_value (sym, frame);
+ }
+ if (val == NULL)
+ {
+ val_error = alloca (strlen (except.message) + 1);
+ strcpy (val_error, except.message);
+ }
+
+ argp->sym = sym;
+ argp->val = val;
+ argp->error = val_error ? xstrdup (val_error) : NULL;
+}
+
/* Read in inferior function parameter SYM at FRAME into ARGP. Caller is
responsible for xfree of ARGP->ERROR. This function never throws an
exception. */
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.trace/mi-trace-unavailable.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.trace/mi-trace-unavailable.exp
index 42f6e32..8926a7e 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.trace/mi-trace-unavailable.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.trace/mi-trace-unavailable.exp
@@ -75,9 +75,6 @@ mi_gdb_test "-trace-save ${tracefile}.tf" ".*\\^done" \
mi_gdb_test "-trace-save -ctf ${tracefile}.ctf" ".*\\^done" \
"save ctf trace file"
-mi_gdb_test "-gdb-set print entry-values no" {\^done} \
- "-gdb-set print entry-values no"
-
proc test_trace_unavailable { data_source } {
global decimal
@@ -89,6 +86,21 @@ proc test_trace_unavailable { data_source } {
".*\\^done,found=\"1\",tracepoint=\"${decimal}\",traceframe=\"0\",frame=\{.*" \
"-trace-find frame-number 0"
+ # Option of print entry-values shouldn't affect the output of
+ # '-stack-list-locals'.
+ foreach entry_values { no only preferred if-needed both compact default } {
+ mi_gdb_test "-gdb-set print entry-values $entry_values" {\^done} ""
+
+ with_test_prefix "$entry_values" {
+ # Test MI command '-stack-list-locals'.
+ mi_gdb_test "-stack-list-locals --simple-values" \
+ ".*\\^done,locals=\\\[\{name=\"array\",type=\"unsigned char \\\[2\\\]\"\},\{name=\"i\",type=\"int\",value=\"<unavailable>\"\}\\\]" \
+ "-stack-list-locals --simple-values"
+ }
+ }
+
+ mi_gdb_test "-gdb-set print entry-values no" {\^done} ""
+
# Test MI command '-stack-list-locals'.
mi_gdb_test "-stack-list-locals --simple-values" \
".*\\^done,locals=\\\[\{name=\"array\",type=\"unsigned char \\\[2\\\]\"\},\{name=\"i\",type=\"int\",value=\"<unavailable>\"\}\\\]" \
--
1.7.7.6
next reply other threads:[~2013-08-05 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-05 0:45 Yao Qi [this message]
2013-08-05 2:10 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-05 14:12 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-08 6:38 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-08 14:24 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-14 9:46 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-14 11:17 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-14 11:54 ` Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1375663450-5825-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox