On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 06:13 -0300, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Friday, May 24 2013, Svante Signell wrote:
> 
> > I will change to use xstrprintf instead. Updated patch with ChangeLog
> > entry will follow shortly. Is it OK to modify also the other (preceding)
> > function in the same way (for consistency)?
> 
> Thanks.  It is OK IMO, but I'd prefer if you did that in a separate
> patch.

Attached is an updated patch for the build problems on systems where
PATH_MAX is not defined.

Thanks,
Svante