From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-101058-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31391 invoked by alias); 3 May 2013 19:18:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 31355 invoked by uid 89); 3 May 2013 19:18:35 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mailrelay003.isp.belgacom.be (HELO mailrelay003.isp.belgacom.be) (195.238.6.53)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 May 2013 19:18:33 +0000
X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjgDAA0NhFFtgZKL/2dsb2JhbAANQ4Z6uQ6CYwMBgQ+DEwEBAQQjVhALDgoCAiYCAlcGuBRykFuBJI0uXweCQIETA6tt
Received: from 139.146-129-109.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO [192.168.1.7]) ([109.129.146.139])  by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 03 May 2013 21:18:28 +0200
Subject: Re: RFA: fix handling of catch signal SIGTRAP/SIGINT
From: Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-Reply-To: <5183FE38.8040202@redhat.com>
References: <1367433782.2626.142.camel@soleil> <5182B441.3000703@redhat.com>	 <1367531384.3007.83.camel@soleil>  <5183C881.7030801@redhat.com>	 <1367602748.2243.13.camel@soleil>  <5183FE38.8040202@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 19:18:00 -0000
Message-ID: <1367608708.2243.44.camel@soleil>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2

On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 19:13 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 05/03/2013 06:39 PM, Philippe Waroquiers wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 15:24 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> >> Knowing the "catch signal" vs "catch signal all" difference, the updated
> >> patch becomes obviously correct then.  If you had sent it, I'd
> >> probably okay it.  ;-)
> > Here is an updated version.
> 
> OK, thanks.
Thanks for the review, committed.

Philippe