From: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
To: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/15] frame, backtrace: allow targets to supply a frame unwinder
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 12:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367496216-21217-11-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367496216-21217-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Allow targets to supply an own target-specific frame unwinder. If a
target-specific unwinder is supplied, it will be chosen before any other
unwinder.
gdb/
2013-02-11 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* dwarf2-frame.c (dwarf2_frame_cfa): Move UNWIND_UNAVAILABLE check
earlier.
* frame-unwind.c: Include target.h.
(frame_unwind_try_unwinder): New function with code from ...
(frame_unwind_find_by_frame): ... here. New variable
unwinder_from_target, call also target_get_unwinder and
frame_unwind_try_unwinder for it.
* frame.c (get_frame_unwind_stop_reason): Unconditionally call
get_prev_frame_1.
* target.c (target_get_unwinder): New.
* target.h (struct target_ops): New field to_get_unwinder.
(target_get_unwinder): New declaration.
---
gdb/dwarf2-frame.c | 8 ++--
gdb/frame-unwind.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
gdb/frame.c | 9 ++----
gdb/target.c | 14 +++++++++
gdb/target.h | 7 ++++
5 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2-frame.c b/gdb/dwarf2-frame.c
index 5c88b03..2aff23e 100644
--- a/gdb/dwarf2-frame.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2-frame.c
@@ -1497,16 +1497,16 @@ dwarf2_frame_cfa (struct frame_info *this_frame)
{
while (get_frame_type (this_frame) == INLINE_FRAME)
this_frame = get_prev_frame (this_frame);
+ if (get_frame_unwind_stop_reason (this_frame) == UNWIND_UNAVAILABLE)
+ throw_error (NOT_AVAILABLE_ERROR,
+ _("can't compute CFA for this frame: "
+ "required registers or memory are unavailable"));
/* This restriction could be lifted if other unwinders are known to
compute the frame base in a way compatible with the DWARF
unwinder. */
if (!frame_unwinder_is (this_frame, &dwarf2_frame_unwind)
&& !frame_unwinder_is (this_frame, &dwarf2_tailcall_frame_unwind))
error (_("can't compute CFA for this frame"));
- if (get_frame_unwind_stop_reason (this_frame) == UNWIND_UNAVAILABLE)
- throw_error (NOT_AVAILABLE_ERROR,
- _("can't compute CFA for this frame: "
- "required registers or memory are unavailable"));
return get_frame_base (this_frame);
}
\f
diff --git a/gdb/frame-unwind.c b/gdb/frame-unwind.c
index b66febf..fe5f8fb 100644
--- a/gdb/frame-unwind.c
+++ b/gdb/frame-unwind.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include "exceptions.h"
#include "gdb_assert.h"
#include "gdb_obstack.h"
+#include "target.h"
static struct gdbarch_data *frame_unwind_data;
@@ -88,6 +89,48 @@ frame_unwind_append_unwinder (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
(*ip)->unwinder = unwinder;
}
+/* Call SNIFFER from UNWINDER. If it succeeded set UNWINDER for
+ THIS_FRAME and return 1. Otherwise the function keeps THIS_FRAME
+ unchanged and returns 0. */
+
+static int
+frame_unwind_try_unwinder (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **this_cache,
+ const struct frame_unwind *unwinder)
+{
+ struct cleanup *old_cleanup;
+ volatile struct gdb_exception ex;
+ int res = 0;
+
+ old_cleanup = frame_prepare_for_sniffer (this_frame, unwinder);
+
+ TRY_CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
+ {
+ res = unwinder->sniffer (unwinder, this_frame, this_cache);
+ }
+ if (ex.reason < 0 && ex.error == NOT_AVAILABLE_ERROR)
+ {
+ /* This usually means that not even the PC is available,
+ thus most unwinders aren't able to determine if they're
+ the best fit. Keep trying. Fallback prologue unwinders
+ should always accept the frame. */
+ do_cleanups (old_cleanup);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ else if (ex.reason < 0)
+ throw_exception (ex);
+ else if (res)
+ {
+ discard_cleanups (old_cleanup);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ do_cleanups (old_cleanup);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ gdb_assert_not_reached ("frame_unwind_try_unwinder");
+}
+
/* Iterate through sniffers for THIS_FRAME frame until one returns with an
unwinder implementation. THIS_FRAME->UNWIND must be NULL, it will get set
by this function. Possibly initialize THIS_CACHE. */
@@ -98,37 +141,18 @@ frame_unwind_find_by_frame (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **this_cache)
struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (this_frame);
struct frame_unwind_table *table = gdbarch_data (gdbarch, frame_unwind_data);
struct frame_unwind_table_entry *entry;
+ const struct frame_unwind *unwinder_from_target;
+
+ unwinder_from_target = target_get_unwinder ();
+ if (unwinder_from_target != NULL
+ && frame_unwind_try_unwinder (this_frame, this_cache,
+ unwinder_from_target))
+ return;
for (entry = table->list; entry != NULL; entry = entry->next)
- {
- struct cleanup *old_cleanup;
- volatile struct gdb_exception ex;
- int res = 0;
-
- old_cleanup = frame_prepare_for_sniffer (this_frame, entry->unwinder);
-
- TRY_CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
- {
- res = entry->unwinder->sniffer (entry->unwinder, this_frame,
- this_cache);
- }
- if (ex.reason < 0 && ex.error == NOT_AVAILABLE_ERROR)
- {
- /* This usually means that not even the PC is available,
- thus most unwinders aren't able to determine if they're
- the best fit. Keep trying. Fallback prologue unwinders
- should always accept the frame. */
- }
- else if (ex.reason < 0)
- throw_exception (ex);
- else if (res)
- {
- discard_cleanups (old_cleanup);
- return;
- }
+ if (frame_unwind_try_unwinder (this_frame, this_cache, entry->unwinder))
+ return;
- do_cleanups (old_cleanup);
- }
internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, _("frame_unwind_find_by_frame failed"));
}
diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c
index 8d4e2c8..fa59bee 100644
--- a/gdb/frame.c
+++ b/gdb/frame.c
@@ -2357,13 +2357,10 @@ get_frame_sp (struct frame_info *this_frame)
enum unwind_stop_reason
get_frame_unwind_stop_reason (struct frame_info *frame)
{
- /* If we haven't tried to unwind past this point yet, then assume
- that unwinding would succeed. */
- if (frame->prev_p == 0)
- return UNWIND_NO_REASON;
+ /* Fill-in STOP_REASON. */
+ get_prev_frame_1 (frame);
+ gdb_assert (frame->prev_p);
- /* Otherwise, we set a reason when we succeeded (or failed) to
- unwind. */
return frame->stop_reason;
}
diff --git a/gdb/target.c b/gdb/target.c
index 69073d6..cb4f5d9 100644
--- a/gdb/target.c
+++ b/gdb/target.c
@@ -4523,6 +4523,20 @@ target_call_history_range (ULONGEST begin, ULONGEST end, int flags)
tcomplain ();
}
+/* See target.h. */
+
+const struct frame_unwind *
+target_get_unwinder (void)
+{
+ struct target_ops *t;
+
+ for (t = current_target.beneath; t != NULL; t = t->beneath)
+ if (t->to_get_unwinder != NULL)
+ return t->to_get_unwinder;
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
static int
deprecated_debug_xfer_memory (CORE_ADDR memaddr, bfd_byte *myaddr, int len,
int write, struct mem_attrib *attrib,
diff --git a/gdb/target.h b/gdb/target.h
index e26f2a8..e9dade9 100644
--- a/gdb/target.h
+++ b/gdb/target.h
@@ -938,6 +938,10 @@ struct target_ops
(inclusive) to function END (exclusive). */
void (*to_call_history_range) (ULONGEST begin, ULONGEST end, int flags);
+ /* This unwinder is tried before any other arch unwinders. Use NULL if it
+ is not used. */
+ const struct frame_unwind *to_get_unwinder;
+
int to_magic;
/* Need sub-structure for target machine related rather than comm related?
*/
@@ -1816,6 +1820,9 @@ extern char *target_fileio_read_stralloc (const char *filename);
extern int target_core_of_thread (ptid_t ptid);
+/* See to_get_unwinder in struct target_ops. */
+extern const struct frame_unwind *target_get_unwinder (void);
+
/* Verify that the memory in the [MEMADDR, MEMADDR+SIZE) range matches
the contents of [DATA,DATA+SIZE). Returns 1 if there's a match, 0
if there's a mismatch, and -1 if an error is encountered while
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-02 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-02 12:03 [PATCH 00/15] record-btrace: goto support Markus Metzger
2013-05-02 12:03 ` [PATCH 07/15] btrace: add replay position to btrace thread info Markus Metzger
2013-05-02 12:03 ` [PATCH 12/15] record-btrace: provide xfer_partial target method Markus Metzger
2013-05-02 12:03 ` [PATCH 03/15] record-btrace: fix insn range in function call history Markus Metzger
2013-05-02 12:03 ` [PATCH 01/15] gdbarch: add instruction predicate methods Markus Metzger
2013-05-13 15:23 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-05-02 12:03 ` [PATCH 06/15] record-btrace: make ranges include begin and end Markus Metzger
2013-05-02 15:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-05-02 12:03 ` [PATCH 09/15] record-btrace: supply register target methods Markus Metzger
2013-05-02 12:03 ` [PATCH 08/15] target: add ops parameter to to_prepare_to_store method Markus Metzger
2013-05-02 12:03 ` [PATCH 14/15] record-btrace: add record goto target methods Markus Metzger
2013-05-02 17:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-05-02 12:03 ` Markus Metzger [this message]
2013-05-02 12:04 ` [PATCH 02/15] btrace: change branch trace data structure Markus Metzger
2013-05-13 15:25 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-05-14 15:27 ` Metzger, Markus T
2013-05-14 16:11 ` Doug Evans
2013-05-02 12:04 ` [PATCH 15/15] record-btrace: extend unwinder Markus Metzger
2013-05-02 15:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-05-02 12:04 ` [PATCH 04/15] btrace: increase buffer size Markus Metzger
2013-05-02 12:04 ` [PATCH 13/15] record-btrace: add to_wait and to_resume target methods Markus Metzger
2013-05-02 12:04 ` [PATCH 05/15] record-btrace: optionally indent function call history Markus Metzger
2013-05-02 17:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-05-02 12:04 ` [PATCH 11/15] record-btrace, frame: supply target-specific unwinder Markus Metzger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1367496216-21217-11-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
--to=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox