From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8943 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2013 10:10:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 8883 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Mar 2013 10:10:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:10:32 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1UCSLm-0000me-Sh from Hafiz_Abid@mentor.com ; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 02:10:30 -0800 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 4 Mar 2013 02:10:30 -0800 Received: from abidh-ubunto1104 (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.289.1; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:10:24 +0000 Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:10:00 -0000 From: "Abid, Hafiz" Subject: Re: zinteger setshow commands broken To: Pedro Alves CC: , , , In-Reply-To: <5130EFC1.3090102@redhat.com> (from palves@redhat.com on Fri Mar 1 18:13:21 2013) Message-ID: <1362391824.2232.0@abidh-ubunto1104> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp=Yes; format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2 On 01/03/13 18:13:21, Pedro Alves wrote: >=20 > BTW, I think the new var_zuinteger_unlimited would be more > suitable. The difference is that "show" really shows "unlimited" > instead of -1. BTW2, IMO, "set" should accept literal "unlimited" > string as well too. To make sure that I understand it right, you are suggesting that=20=20 commands which accepts -1 as special value should be implemented using=20=20 var_zuinteger_unlimited? One is the new command that I am working on to=20= =20 change the trace buffer size. Other is "remote=20=20 hardware-watchpoint-limit". Regards, Abid