From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 586 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2012 07:47:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 550 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2012 07:47:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FROM_12LTRDOM,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:47:02 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1TTpUT-0003gN-KR from Yao_Qi@mentor.com for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:47:01 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-04.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.41]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 1 Nov 2012 00:47:01 -0700 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-04.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 00:47:00 -0700 From: Yao Qi To: Subject: [PATCH 0/6] Remove unused operator OP_LABELED Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1351756007-18242-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 Hello, In Aug., I posted patches to remove unused operators except OP_LABELED, [RFC 0/3] Remove unused operators OP_BITSTRING TERNOP_SLICE_COUNT and TYPE_CODE_BITSTRING http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-08/msg00307.html This patch set removes the unused operator OP_LABELED. Since OP_LABELED related code was coupled with others, the removal is done step by step in order to make each patch easy to read. Patch 1/6 is to remove OP_LABELED, and patch 2/6 - 4/6 are to remove unused code as a result of patch 1/6. Patch 5/6 is for indentation, and patch 6/6 is to add a test to make sure my change is correct. The whole patch set is tested on x86_64-linux. Is it OK?