From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7447 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2012 22:41:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 7438 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jul 2012 22:41:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_QE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mailrelay012.isp.belgacom.be (HELO mailrelay012.isp.belgacom.be) (195.238.6.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:40:58 +0000 X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqIBAPbGEVBR9qAt/2dsb2JhbAANOIVxsUGFLwEBAQQjVhALGAICJgICVwawAm6TN4EgkBGBEgOec4lD Received: from 45.160-246-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO [192.168.1.2]) ([81.246.160.45]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 27 Jul 2012 00:40:57 +0200 Subject: Re: [patch] [i386] Put hlt at the ON_STACK breakpoint [Re: GDB 7.4.91 available for testing] From: Philippe Waroquiers To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Pedro Alves , Jan Kratochvil , gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <1343339768.2258.126.camel@soleil> References: <20120723072125.GA12958@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120723155951.GA24718@adacore.com> <20120723163513.GA1222@host2.jankratochvil.net> <1343074047.2209.23.camel@soleil> <20120723201611.GA19567@host2.jankratochvil.net> <1343075809.2209.53.camel@soleil> <501009AE.40901@redhat.com> <1343247870.2240.29.camel@soleil> <20120725212653.GC2767@adacore.com> <1343252775.2240.51.camel@soleil> <20120725223933.GD2767@adacore.com> <1343339768.2258.126.camel@soleil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 22:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1343342470.2258.148.camel@soleil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00649.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 23:56 +0200, Philippe Waroquiers wrote: > I imagine however that a breakpoint trap instruction will be the > most likely common denominator amongst "strange" gdbserver. > The other "strange" gdbsrv I know about is the qemu one. > Just tried to build the last qemu to see how it works, > but build failed. Finally succeeded to build qemu on i386, but its gdbserver encounters an error when executing an inferior call (at least on i386). Philippe