From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 85jXEXHSHGAKFgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:06:57 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 3D2C91EFCB; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 00:06:57 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (unknown [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B64F71E939 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 00:06:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B02B39DA415; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 05:06:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6B02B39DA415 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1612501616; bh=hRhp9qgb3zuqgy1d2Fl7ZfypncWnWW06IizU3xf413s=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=cPJ0FBkYYdWYnfjjq17PgODWADVYZ1WlTM+XMJsYGMms/btqVM2kfpmD0ZzZzV7+A SqjsAwowIMWA21J00gSGF0Rx+JJcLOwpi4YA0Hi+1gwUc7pBp4cEKTYVS8QqZZiXKH Nb1oZCkW91iGdoDut1BDhsZyxoVjPYFyxrRLPJSY= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AB9939DA41D for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 05:06:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 7AB9939DA41D Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 11556mge019366 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 00:06:53 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 11556mge019366 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7785B1E939; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 00:06:48 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 24/25] Add NEWS entry. To: Luis Machado , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20210127202112.2485702-1-luis.machado@linaro.org> <20210127202112.2485702-25-luis.machado@linaro.org> Message-ID: <133eb559-cf96-931d-fb02-c5b34402a3c7@polymtl.ca> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 00:06:48 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210127202112.2485702-25-luis.machado@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Fri, 5 Feb 2021 05:06:48 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2021-01-27 3:21 p.m., Luis Machado via Gdb-patches wrote: > Updates on v4: > > - Update command names. > > -- > > Mention the new packets and memory tagging features. > > gdb/ChangeLog: > > YYYY-MM-DD Luis Machado > > * NEWS: Mention memory tagging changes. > --- > gdb/NEWS | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS > index d2ed28857b..a4e08491ee 100644 > --- a/gdb/NEWS > +++ b/gdb/NEWS > @@ -3,6 +3,21 @@ > > *** Changes since GDB 10 > > +* GDB now supports general memory tagging functionality if the underlying > + architecture supports the proper primitives and hooks. Currently this is > + enabled only for AArch64 MTE. > + > + This includes: > + > + - Additional information when the inferior crashes with a SIGSEGV caused by > + a memory tag violation. > + > + - A new modifier 'm' for the "x" command, which displays allocation tags for a > + particular memory range. > + > + - Display of memory tag mismatches by "print", for addresses and > + pointers, if memory tagging is supported by the architecture. You might also want to mention the options added by your previous patch, about memory-tag-violations. Simon