From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21660 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2012 18:47:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 21647 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jan 2012 18:47:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e24smtp01.br.ibm.com (HELO e24smtp01.br.ibm.com) (32.104.18.85) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:47:09 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e24smtp01.br.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:47:05 -0200 Received: from mailhub1.br.ibm.com ([9.18.232.109]) by e24smtp01.br.ibm.com ([10.172.0.143]) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:46:55 -0200 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (d24av01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.91]) by mailhub1.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q06IlxMa1061280 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:48:01 -0200 Received: from d24av01.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q06Ikeso021486 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:46:40 -0200 Received: from [9.8.4.34] ([9.8.4.34]) by d24av01.br.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id q06Ikeuc021482; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:46:40 -0200 Message-ID: <1325875606.17875.10.camel@hactar> Subject: Re: [obv][commit] Add volatile keyword on struct gdb_exception From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:47:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mime-Version: 1.0 x-cbid: 12010618-1524-0000-0000-000000D21C86 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 Hi Sérgio! On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 01:36 -0200, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Hi, > > This subject has been discussed a while ago, but I think it was > forgotten (at least by myself): > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-08/msg00091.html > > Then, while doing something else, I remembered this problem and decided > to do a quick fix. I think this patch classifies as "obvious", since it > does not add any feature nor code modifications. This is great, thanks! -- []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center