From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24539 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2011 01:37:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 24529 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Apr 2011 01:37:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hub3.qnx.com (HELO hub3.qnx.com) (209.226.137.86) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 01:36:57 +0000 Received: by hub3.qnx.com (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 1115F6C51BF; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 21:37:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.ott.qnx.com (orion.ott.qnx.com [10.42.3.40]) by hub3.qnx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077C56C51B1; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 21:37:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nebula.ott.qnx.com ([10.42.3.30]) by orion.ott.qnx.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 5 Apr 2011 21:36:14 -0400 Received: from [192.168.20.97] ([192.168.20.97]) by nebula.ott.qnx.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 5 Apr 2011 21:36:30 -0400 Subject: Re: [rfc v2][rft (procfs, nto-procfs)] Fix signal bypass heuristic with software single-step From: Aleksandar Ristovski To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: Pedro Alves , brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <201104052256.p35MuWKM021676@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> References: <201104052256.p35MuWKM021676@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 01:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1302053790.16582.71.camel@qnxws7629> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 18:56 -0400, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Aleksandar Ristovski wrote: > > > Aleksandar, would it be possible for you to test the patch on a > > > NTO machine? > > > > [AR] > > yes, but you'd have to give me some time. I am over my head with > work on > > immediate deliveries. > > Sure, thanks for helping with the test! > > > How urgent do you need it? > > There's no fixed deadline -- I was hoping to get this resolved maybe > by end of the month or so, but whenever you get around to it is of > course fine with me ... I should be able to do it by the end of the month (probably close to the end - sorry for the delay). Thanks, Aleksandar