From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id XuXsI7F15mm7JC0AWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:51:29 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=I7CB2m9e; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=yfcxkv9E; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=I7CB2m9e; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=yfcxkv9E; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 803501E093; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:51:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58C961E093 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:51:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06174CCCA22 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:51:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B06174CCCA22 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=I7CB2m9e; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=yfcxkv9E; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=I7CB2m9e; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=yfcxkv9E Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B73F14BA2E23 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:51:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B73F14BA2E23 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org B73F14BA2E23 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1776711061; cv=none; b=u0N3ellDFkg3OfnLQl/DwzSFeONerphL0KTXSxgYi34XHsMqjJevLr6fQ9wRqqgTMQIZ6m3UU+uiARx1Bgy4hU+e3OHiJCR8xg7tmB3ExYeEly3Y8xLW35K7Avm1PEac3UE5D1FGngr4fqXP7P4uGigTO4K9UD3U3OFy0MsRKsY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1776711061; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aATflxTcS/J8jbWi016YREFhdHxszr1ZO3fMCnPyCgs=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature: Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=xxXNez+cnvynpbGMJUM2Btepzhvz8B1wgesLWDemke9KQOgM4uLN+RWQ9+mFZM55bT3cJuEMiiBl90wfAeLkKA3ctYC++HA+ESzIUYDoXG3qhMMt4qmHZFa9f9DBaLFmfagI3oX16hmFP3QXkf/Ml+d6ie7oK3ubqDjqX95egYk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B73F14BA2E23 Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E0C96A7D5; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:51:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1776711060; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=slWtqCPeXkryliShkwpFyHPE1bSUNE7kiXfx+ETlxFU=; b=I7CB2m9eb9dCwv27A8jo0/KCrmXzClDr6Jxf9372XdiJco4p5hz/1rSB1KTWPJC4yOmQFj UTw/jd4PS/CopdVdi3wgICgOdC4PEMjnkUMpm6mKuY0+yFlZIfmj+kzCN3J8fXmnlOBSUI 8N9KVP6XSA9dz5l57TIOcGgECwUo8bg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1776711060; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=slWtqCPeXkryliShkwpFyHPE1bSUNE7kiXfx+ETlxFU=; b=yfcxkv9EQX0oK0piZD+1++e/UZYkxRg2FexkrXpT13rSzaIuyqqU/MUlUfyveYBL+kZeTs zG4IE/unAErm8FCg== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1776711060; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=slWtqCPeXkryliShkwpFyHPE1bSUNE7kiXfx+ETlxFU=; b=I7CB2m9eb9dCwv27A8jo0/KCrmXzClDr6Jxf9372XdiJco4p5hz/1rSB1KTWPJC4yOmQFj UTw/jd4PS/CopdVdi3wgICgOdC4PEMjnkUMpm6mKuY0+yFlZIfmj+kzCN3J8fXmnlOBSUI 8N9KVP6XSA9dz5l57TIOcGgECwUo8bg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1776711060; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=slWtqCPeXkryliShkwpFyHPE1bSUNE7kiXfx+ETlxFU=; b=yfcxkv9EQX0oK0piZD+1++e/UZYkxRg2FexkrXpT13rSzaIuyqqU/MUlUfyveYBL+kZeTs zG4IE/unAErm8FCg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED043593AE; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id EI2tOJN15mlbZAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:50:59 +0000 Message-ID: <12ebfa51-ca19-4542-9b85-18caae3a695f@suse.de> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 20:50:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: ready for the GDB 17.2 corrective release? To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <625667ed-af57-4663-849c-ea73a100aea6@suse.de> Content-Language: en-US From: Tom de Vries In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.30 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.988]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[sourceware.org:url, imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo, suse.de:mid] X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On 4/20/26 8:32 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hi Tom, > >> I'd like to nominate PR31449 [1] and PR33794 [2]. They're both crashes that >> happen when querying the user about enabling debuginfod while enabling TUI. >> >> I've submitted low-risk patches for both PRs ( >> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2026-April/226551.html ). >> >> I'm not sure if the PRs are severe enough to block the release for: crashes >> are serious, but the likelihood that such a crash will trigger is not high, >> I think, which is probably why we have lived with it, probably since the >> query was introduced in 2021. >> >> But the fact that low-risk patches are available might be reason enough to >> consider including them. > > Thanks for pointing those two PRs out. Let's start by marking them as > targetting 17.2 for the time being, so we don't forget about them. > > How soon do you anticipate you'll be able to have those changes pushed? Well, they're waiting for review. > There are really two things to consider: > > * Are the patches suitable for the 17 branch? If they are low risk > and prevent a crash, that seems like an easy "yes". Yes, they are. > * Are the issues problematic-enough that we would want to wait extra > for them. The answer depends on how frequently we think people > are going to hit the issue. Right. > > If this issue is a regression of release 17 compared to release 16, > this changes the perspective as well. > It's not a regression AFAIK. > I have no strong opinion either way, FWIW. > Ack, thanks. -Tom