From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [gdb/build] Fix Wmaybe-uninitialized in tid_range_parser::get_tid_or_range
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 12:25:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12961fa5-a826-4823-97b6-2fce3e5bf19d@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027094926.2701072-1-tdevries@suse.de>
On 10/27/26 5:49 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On aarch64-linux with an -O3 build, I run into:
> ...
> gdb/tid-parse.c: In function ‘int tid_is_in_list(const char*, int, int, int)’:
> gdb/tid-parse.c:375:39: warning: ‘tmp_thr_end’ may be used uninitialized \
> [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> 374 | if (tmp_inf == inf_num
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 375 | && tmp_thr_start <= thr_num && thr_num <= tmp_thr_end)
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> gdb/tid-parse.c:370:35: note: ‘tmp_thr_end’ was declared here
> 370 | int tmp_inf, tmp_thr_start, tmp_thr_end;
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> ...
>
> This is a false positive.
>
> The warning is triggered in the tail of function
> tid_range_parser::get_tid_or_range:
> ...
> /* If we successfully parsed a thread number or finished parsing a
> thread range, switch back to assuming the next TID is
> inferior-qualified. */
> if (!m_range_parser.in_range ())
> {
> m_state = STATE_INFERIOR;
> m_cur_tok = m_range_parser.cur_tok ();
>
> if (thr_end != NULL)
> *thr_end = *thr_start;
> }
>
> /* If we're midway through a range, and the caller wants the end
> value, return it and skip to the end of the range. */
> if (thr_end != NULL
> && (m_state == STATE_THREAD_RANGE
> || m_state == STATE_STAR_RANGE))
> {
> *thr_end = m_range_parser.end_value ();
>
> skip_range ();
> }
>
> return (*inf_num != 0 && *thr_start != 0);
> }
> ...
>
> To understand what's happening, we need to know two things:
> - m_state has enum type with 3 valid values: STATE_INFERIOR,
> STATE_THREAD_RANGE, STATE_STAR_RANGE, and
> - at the start of the code snippet, m_state != STATE_INFERIOR.
>
> The first lets us reduce this:
> ...
> if (thr_end != NULL
> && (m_state == STATE_THREAD_RANGE
> || m_state == STATE_STAR_RANGE))
> ...
> to:
> ...
> if (thr_end != NULL && m_state != STATE_INFERIOR)
> ...
>
> The second lets us reduce it to:
> ...
> else if (thr_end != NULL)
> ...
> at which point the warning is no longer triggered.
>
> And if we copy the return to the first if clause, we simply get:
> ...
> if (thr_end != NULL)
> ...
>
> Do this simplification and get rid of the warning.
>
> Tested on aarch64-linux.
>
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34892
Ok, I think I followed that, with the new structure it's more obvious to
the compiler that *thr_end is always set (if thr_end != nullptr).
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Simon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 9:49 Tom de Vries
2026-10-27 16:25 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12961fa5-a826-4823-97b6-2fce3e5bf19d@simark.ca \
--to=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox