From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-76779-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 18891 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2010 18:06:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 18881 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Dec 2010 18:06:29 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (94.185.240.25)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:06:24 +0000
Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21])	by service87.mimecast.com;	Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:06:20 +0000
Received: from [10.1.67.34] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);	 Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:06:18 +0000
Subject: Re: [patch, testsuite] General ARM target triplet
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>, "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1012031802300.6822@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <4CF91BD4.7090708@codesourcery.com>	 <1291397752.27205.18.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com>	 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1012031802300.6822@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:06:00 -0000
Message-Id: <1291399578.27205.20.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-MC-Unique: 110120318062003201
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2


On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 18:05 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>=20
> > It's probably better to make this a specific test for strongarm* and
> > arm* rather than a very wide-ranging glob.
>=20
> We eliminated support for strongarm*-*-*, ep9312*-*-*, xscale*-*-*=20
> canonical target triplets in GCC 4.3, advising users to use arm*-*-*=20
> instead.  Perhaps config.sub should be changed to make those triplets=20
> noncanonical (mapping them to arm*-*-* canonical forms) so that no=20
> software using config.sub needs to deal with them?
>=20

makes sense to me.

R.