From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9740 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2012 19:59:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 9729 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2012 19:59:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (HELO tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU) (128.32.153.206) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:58:58 +0000 Received: from tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q09JwkY1012816; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:58:46 -0800 (PST) To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Have block_innermost_frame start from selected frame Reply-To: Hilfinger@CS.Berkeley.EDU In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:13:28 +0200. <83sjjoer47.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <12815.1326139126@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU> From: Paul Hilfinger Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00278.txt.bz2 > > Eli, your actual comment was a question about whether the syntax > > applied to watch (given that all the examples used print). On > > consideration, I decided to keep things as they are > > What does this mean? what exactly did you leave unchanged? > > And do I need to review the doc patch again, or is it largely > unchanged? > Sorry. I meant that you should not have to review the doc/ part of the patch, which is unchanged since the last time I submitted it. I did not add any text specific to watchpoints, etc., on the grounds that the entire chapter already appears intended to describe expressions in general, and apparently has been understood as such up until now. Thanks. Paul