From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9731 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2010 14:20:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 9717 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Feb 2010 14:20:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:20:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1OEK3KG015787 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:20:04 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1OEJxLW023517; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:20:00 -0500 Subject: Re: FYI: fix big-endian bug with DWARF_VALUE_STACK From: Mark Wielaard To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <201002241411.o1OEBrHC011378@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> References: <201002241411.o1OEBrHC011378@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <1267021199.6461.10.camel@springer.wildebeest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00591.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 15:11 +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > However, maybe I'm missing something here, in particular as I haven't been > able to find a formal specification of DW_OP_stack_value -- I assume this > is in the current DWARF4 draft? Is this available somewhere? The latest drafts are here: http://www.dwarfstd.org/doc/